Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

The performance of the feature sets selected for the causal discovery experiments.

Alexander Aushev (5993120)
Vicent Ribas Ripoll (5993123)
Alfredo Vellido (126311)
Federico Aletti (5993126)
Bernardo Bollen Pinto (4224874)
Antoine Herpain (5993129)
Emiel Hendrik Post (5993132)
Eduardo Romay Medina (5993135)
Ricard Ferrer (3759631)
Giuseppe Baselli (267532)
Karim Bendjelid (3072015)

Publication date

November 2018

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0199089.t004

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Abstract

The performance of the feature sets selected for the causal discovery experiments.</p

Extracted data

Related items

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.

Fuad A. Ghaleb (5993252)
Maznah Bte Kamat (5993255)
Mazleena Salleh (3383588)
Mohd Foad Rohani (782460)
Shukor Abd Razak (3383591)

November 2018

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.</p

Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...

Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).

Muhammad Zubair Asghar (813109)
Aurangzeb Khan (813110)
Shakeel Ahmad (702854)
Imran Ali Khan (813111)
Fazal Masud Kundi (813112)

October 2015

<p>Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).</p

Performance of different feature combinations for disease detection and quantification.

Wenhui Chen (3208248)
Lianrong Zheng (3343868)
Kunyang Li (1806298)
Qian Wang (32718)
Guanzheng Liu (583993)
Qing Jiang (197843)

November 2016

<p>Performance of different feature combinations for disease detection and quantification.</p

Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.

Md. Mehedi Hasan (755447)
Hiroyuki Kurata (35718)

October 2018

Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p

The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.

Mithun Padmakumar (4781754)
Keith L. Brain (190706)
John S. Young (88531)
Rohit Manchanda (4781751)

January 2018

<p>The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.</p

Performance comparison of various feature sets for classification of essential genes.

Karthik Azhagesan (6083138)
Balaraman Ravindran (749709)
Karthik Raman (34347)

December 2018

Performance comparison of various feature sets for classification of essential genes.</p

The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials.

Aya Kabbara (844823)
Mohamad Khalil (797029)
Wassim El-Falou (844824)
Hassan Eid (844825)
Mahmoud Hassan (614112)

January 2016

<p>The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials...

Performance indicators of the sparse fusion feature subset and the full feature on different classifiers.

Shihong Yao (5664922)
Tao Wang (12008)
Weiming Shen (785790)
Shaoming Pan (2228239)
Yanwen Chong (771264)
Fei Ding (134577)

August 2015

<p>Performance indicators of the sparse fusion feature subset and the full feature on different clas...

Performance of different feature combinations using automatically predicted medical concepts.

Yan Xu (14594)
Ji Hua (649114)
Zhaoheng Ni (649115)
Qinlang Chen (649116)
Yubo Fan (301788)
Sophia Ananiadou (226318)
Eric I-Chao Chang (649117)
Junichi Tsujii (226334)

October 2014

<p>Performance of different feature combinations using automatically predicted medical concepts.</p

The performance of models on an independent datasets, these models were developed on standard datasets.

Jagat Singh Chauhan (428660)
Alka Rao (153095)
Gajendra P. S. Raghava (50436)

June 2013

<p>The performance of models on an independent datasets, these models were developed on standard dat...

The performance of different classifiers associated with the attribute selection methods assessed.

Camila Viana Vieira Farhate (4827780)
Zigomar Menezes de Souza (4827795)
Stanley Robson de Medeiros Oliveira (4827789)
Rose Luiza Moraes Tavares (4919512)
João Luís Nunes Carvalho (4827792)

March 2018

<p>The performance of different classifiers associated with the attribute selection methods assessed...

Performance comparison of different feature selection techniques on EN dataset in group AB.

Hakimeh Khojasteh (16748091)
Jamshid Pirgazi (5508737)
Ali Ghanbari Sorkhi (16748094)

August 2023

Performance comparison of different feature selection techniques on EN dataset in group AB.</p

Overview of the datasets and their distributions of active and inactive experimental results.

Kyrylo Klimenko (2887322)
Sine A. Rosenberg (6459512)
Marianne Dybdahl (6459515)
Eva B. Wedebye (2476159)
Nikolai G. Nikolov (6459518)

March 2019

Overview of the datasets and their distributions of active and inactive experimental results.</p

Datasets tested for features significantly separating successful targets from failed targets.

Andrew D. Rouillard (5244362)
Mark R. Hurle (5244359)
Pankaj Agarwal (191011)

May 2018

<p>Datasets tested for features significantly separating successful targets from failed targets.</p

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.

Fuad A. Ghaleb (5993252)
Maznah Bte Kamat (5993255)
Mazleena Salleh (3383588)
Mohd Foad Rohani (782460)
Shukor Abd Razak (3383591)

November 2018

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.</p

Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...

Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).

Muhammad Zubair Asghar (813109)
Aurangzeb Khan (813110)
Shakeel Ahmad (702854)
Imran Ali Khan (813111)
Fazal Masud Kundi (813112)

October 2015

<p>Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).</p

Performance of different feature combinations for disease detection and quantification.

Wenhui Chen (3208248)
Lianrong Zheng (3343868)
Kunyang Li (1806298)
Qian Wang (32718)
Guanzheng Liu (583993)
Qing Jiang (197843)

November 2016

<p>Performance of different feature combinations for disease detection and quantification.</p

Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.

Md. Mehedi Hasan (755447)
Hiroyuki Kurata (35718)

October 2018

Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p

The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.

Mithun Padmakumar (4781754)
Keith L. Brain (190706)
John S. Young (88531)
Rohit Manchanda (4781751)

January 2018

<p>The replication efficiencies obtained for different data sets used in the study.</p

Performance comparison of various feature sets for classification of essential genes.

Karthik Azhagesan (6083138)
Balaraman Ravindran (749709)
Karthik Raman (34347)

December 2018

Performance comparison of various feature sets for classification of essential genes.</p

The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials.

Aya Kabbara (844823)
Mohamad Khalil (797029)
Wassim El-Falou (844824)
Hassan Eid (844825)
Mahmoud Hassan (614112)

January 2016

<p>The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials...

Performance indicators of the sparse fusion feature subset and the full feature on different classifiers.

Shihong Yao (5664922)
Tao Wang (12008)
Weiming Shen (785790)
Shaoming Pan (2228239)
Yanwen Chong (771264)
Fei Ding (134577)

August 2015

<p>Performance indicators of the sparse fusion feature subset and the full feature on different clas...

Performance of different feature combinations using automatically predicted medical concepts.

Yan Xu (14594)
Ji Hua (649114)
Zhaoheng Ni (649115)
Qinlang Chen (649116)
Yubo Fan (301788)
Sophia Ananiadou (226318)
Eric I-Chao Chang (649117)
Junichi Tsujii (226334)

October 2014

<p>Performance of different feature combinations using automatically predicted medical concepts.</p

The performance of models on an independent datasets, these models were developed on standard datasets.

Jagat Singh Chauhan (428660)
Alka Rao (153095)
Gajendra P. S. Raghava (50436)

June 2013

<p>The performance of models on an independent datasets, these models were developed on standard dat...

The performance of different classifiers associated with the attribute selection methods assessed.

Camila Viana Vieira Farhate (4827780)
Zigomar Menezes de Souza (4827795)
Stanley Robson de Medeiros Oliveira (4827789)
Rose Luiza Moraes Tavares (4919512)
João Luís Nunes Carvalho (4827792)

March 2018

<p>The performance of different classifiers associated with the attribute selection methods assessed...

Performance comparison of different feature selection techniques on EN dataset in group AB.

Hakimeh Khojasteh (16748091)
Jamshid Pirgazi (5508737)
Ali Ghanbari Sorkhi (16748094)

August 2023

Performance comparison of different feature selection techniques on EN dataset in group AB.</p

Overview of the datasets and their distributions of active and inactive experimental results.

Kyrylo Klimenko (2887322)
Sine A. Rosenberg (6459512)
Marianne Dybdahl (6459515)
Eva B. Wedebye (2476159)
Nikolai G. Nikolov (6459518)

March 2019

Overview of the datasets and their distributions of active and inactive experimental results.</p

Datasets tested for features significantly separating successful targets from failed targets.

Andrew D. Rouillard (5244362)
Mark R. Hurle (5244359)
Pankaj Agarwal (191011)

May 2018

<p>Datasets tested for features significantly separating successful targets from failed targets.</p

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.

Fuad A. Ghaleb (5993252)
Maznah Bte Kamat (5993255)
Mazleena Salleh (3383588)
Mohd Foad Rohani (782460)
Shukor Abd Razak (3383591)

November 2018

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.</p

Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...

Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).

Muhammad Zubair Asghar (813109)
Aurangzeb Khan (813110)
Shakeel Ahmad (702854)
Imran Ali Khan (813111)
Fazal Masud Kundi (813112)

October 2015

<p>Experimental results on testing datasets (P = Precision, R = Recall, F = F-Score).</p