Raw material groups, their within-group shape variabilities and the proportion caused by differences in each of the physical dimensions.</p
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Sample groups containing different weight percentages and types of adhesion promoter.</p
<p>Scatter plots showing relationship between BMD and stiffness in subgroup A, B and C.</p
Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p
Summary of estimates for variance in surface roughness (Ra) for each material group preparation.</p
The color coding represents the variability of each landmark in its respective group. The table show...
Relative proportions of main raw material types per layer at KDS (lithics ≥2cm).</p
<p>Rounded percentages are given in brackets.</p><p>Distribution of raw materials (>30 mm).</p
Subgroup analysis for differences in characteristics associated with completeness scores by professi...
<p>The proportion of different severity levels of refractive anisometropia by refractive groups.</p
Proportions of length to diameter of beads (GN) according to the typological families and materials....
Proportions of length to diameter of beads (GN) according to the typological families and materials....
<p>Relative abundance of skeletal element groups within different lithofacies.</p
<p>Every sub-figure in Fig. 2 is divided into 7 groups. Sub-figure (a) is the figure of random divis...
Diversity of raw materials in relation to the typological families of the items discovered in CG7.</...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Sample groups containing different weight percentages and types of adhesion promoter.</p
<p>Scatter plots showing relationship between BMD and stiffness in subgroup A, B and C.</p
Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p
Summary of estimates for variance in surface roughness (Ra) for each material group preparation.</p
The color coding represents the variability of each landmark in its respective group. The table show...
Relative proportions of main raw material types per layer at KDS (lithics ≥2cm).</p
<p>Rounded percentages are given in brackets.</p><p>Distribution of raw materials (>30 mm).</p
Subgroup analysis for differences in characteristics associated with completeness scores by professi...
<p>The proportion of different severity levels of refractive anisometropia by refractive groups.</p
Proportions of length to diameter of beads (GN) according to the typological families and materials....
Proportions of length to diameter of beads (GN) according to the typological families and materials....
<p>Relative abundance of skeletal element groups within different lithofacies.</p
<p>Every sub-figure in Fig. 2 is divided into 7 groups. Sub-figure (a) is the figure of random divis...
Diversity of raw materials in relation to the typological families of the items discovered in CG7.</...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Sample groups containing different weight percentages and types of adhesion promoter.</p
<p>Scatter plots showing relationship between BMD and stiffness in subgroup A, B and C.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG