Repeated-measures one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test results showing main effects of time across repeated trials for percent of total distance travelled in the open arms, percent of total time spent in the open arms and percent of total entries made to the open arm across 13 EPM trials. Trials not significantly different compared to the first trial are reported as “ns,” and trials that do differ significantly from the first trial are reported with an associated p-value.</p
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
Percentage of trial results for each design for the two-arm scenarios 1 and 2 as function of recruit...
Repeated-measures one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test results showing main effects of time acr...
Open arm avoidance measures presented as percentages of total distance (A), total time (B), and tota...
Lines of best fit for basic movements (A), open arm distance (B), open arm time (C), and open arm en...
Basic movements (A), open/closed arm distance (B), open/closed arm time (C), and open/closed arm ent...
<p>For both handling methods, mean ± SEM are shown. Time spent in arms is presented as proportion of...
*<p>Mean time spent by participants with complete data at baseline and follow up. Participants with ...
*<p>- Mean (T1) significantly different (p<0.05) from (T2) mean; ++ - Mean (T1) different (p<0.05) f...
Trials for comparing I treatments with a control are considered, where the aim is to identify one tr...
Percentage of trial results for each design for the two-arm scenarios 3, 4 and 5 as function of recr...
<p>Time spent in positive and negative arms are inversely related and both are shown for reference p...
<p>Results shown are (a) time spent in novel arm and (b) latency to novel arm. Results represent the...
<p>There were no differences in the total arm entries between groups. Statistical analysis was perfo...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
Percentage of trial results for each design for the two-arm scenarios 1 and 2 as function of recruit...
Repeated-measures one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test results showing main effects of time acr...
Open arm avoidance measures presented as percentages of total distance (A), total time (B), and tota...
Lines of best fit for basic movements (A), open arm distance (B), open arm time (C), and open arm en...
Basic movements (A), open/closed arm distance (B), open/closed arm time (C), and open/closed arm ent...
<p>For both handling methods, mean ± SEM are shown. Time spent in arms is presented as proportion of...
*<p>Mean time spent by participants with complete data at baseline and follow up. Participants with ...
*<p>- Mean (T1) significantly different (p<0.05) from (T2) mean; ++ - Mean (T1) different (p<0.05) f...
Trials for comparing I treatments with a control are considered, where the aim is to identify one tr...
Percentage of trial results for each design for the two-arm scenarios 3, 4 and 5 as function of recr...
<p>Time spent in positive and negative arms are inversely related and both are shown for reference p...
<p>Results shown are (a) time spent in novel arm and (b) latency to novel arm. Results represent the...
<p>There were no differences in the total arm entries between groups. Statistical analysis was perfo...
<p>(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...
Average looking times to trials consistent or inconsistent with familiarization (Trial Type, trials ...
Percentage of trial results for each design for the two-arm scenarios 1 and 2 as function of recruit...