(A) Adaptation and (B) kinematic error (MPE) shown for each group (G1 to G5). Plots are mean ± s.e. across subjects for Out (red) and Return (blue) movements. The sign of the adaptation is relative to the force field experienced during training so that positive values correspond to appropriate compensation for the Training field. Similarly, MPE is positive for errors that are in the same direction as the Training force field. Note that the negative adaptation and MPE for the Out trials of Probe2, G4, reflects adaptation to the opposite force field, relative to Training.</p
<p>The effect is measured by the initial directional deviations of the trajectories (TRJ-aftereffect...
This study investigated how movement error is evaluated and used to change feedforward commands foll...
<p><b>(A) Experimental setup.</b> Subjects made reaching movements from mid-line in both forward (90...
<p>(A) Mean kinematic error (solid line) and SE across participants (shaded region) during the adapt...
A. Adaptation for the Return trials of Probe2 for G1 (mean ± s.e. across subjects in 6 bins of 12 tr...
<p>(A) Initial directional deviation of movements to the learned target (LT), as a function of the n...
<p><b>(A)</b> Evolution of position- and velocity-dependent gains during adaptation and decay for pF...
<p>(a,b) Maximal Perpendicular Distance in training sessions, not including catch and after-catch tr...
<p><b>(A)</b> Force profiles showing the average temporal structure of the adaptive response for pFF...
The coupling matrix for model M8 is shown for selected trials during the Training phase experienced ...
<div><p>(A) The origin of the center movements is aligned with the subject's body midline, and the o...
Humans continuously adapt to new sensorimotor environments, wherein we create motor commands to exec...
<div><p>(A) A field where forces are linearly dependent on both limb position and velocity.</p> ...
<p>(<b>A</b>, <b>B</b>) The performance quantified by the (baseline-subtracted) force field compensa...
The plot shows movement error in degrees versus trial number during simulation of the 3-phase experi...
<p>The effect is measured by the initial directional deviations of the trajectories (TRJ-aftereffect...
This study investigated how movement error is evaluated and used to change feedforward commands foll...
<p><b>(A) Experimental setup.</b> Subjects made reaching movements from mid-line in both forward (90...
<p>(A) Mean kinematic error (solid line) and SE across participants (shaded region) during the adapt...
A. Adaptation for the Return trials of Probe2 for G1 (mean ± s.e. across subjects in 6 bins of 12 tr...
<p>(A) Initial directional deviation of movements to the learned target (LT), as a function of the n...
<p><b>(A)</b> Evolution of position- and velocity-dependent gains during adaptation and decay for pF...
<p>(a,b) Maximal Perpendicular Distance in training sessions, not including catch and after-catch tr...
<p><b>(A)</b> Force profiles showing the average temporal structure of the adaptive response for pFF...
The coupling matrix for model M8 is shown for selected trials during the Training phase experienced ...
<div><p>(A) The origin of the center movements is aligned with the subject's body midline, and the o...
Humans continuously adapt to new sensorimotor environments, wherein we create motor commands to exec...
<div><p>(A) A field where forces are linearly dependent on both limb position and velocity.</p> ...
<p>(<b>A</b>, <b>B</b>) The performance quantified by the (baseline-subtracted) force field compensa...
The plot shows movement error in degrees versus trial number during simulation of the 3-phase experi...
<p>The effect is measured by the initial directional deviations of the trajectories (TRJ-aftereffect...
This study investigated how movement error is evaluated and used to change feedforward commands foll...
<p><b>(A) Experimental setup.</b> Subjects made reaching movements from mid-line in both forward (90...