Experiment 3: Results of logistic regression predicting choosing on second and third recognition test trials based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Second choices in a visual span of apprehension task

Yellott, JI
Curnow, PF

July 1967

Four Ss were run in a visual span of apprehension experiment to determine whether second choices mad...

Stay probability transition-outcome interaction for Q(1) agent due to trial start action values.

Thomas Akam (836782)
Rui Costa (75687)
Peter Dayan (26734)

December 2015

(A) Predictor loadings for logistic regression model predicting whether the Q(1) ag...

Fig 3 -

Nathan Tardiff (6089168)
Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj (13924841)
Yale E. Cohen (13924844)
Joshua I. Gold (13119355)

October 2022

Logistic analysis of the bias (A) and adaptation-like (B) effects in the stimulus-based condition, a...

Experiments 1 and 2: Final models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Final models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 bas...

Experiments 1 and 2: Complete models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Complete models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 ...

Results of conditional logistic regression testing for the effects of various factors on preference using the first choice made during trials.

Rebecca C. Wilcox (3243009)
Robert J. Fletcher Jr. (431571)

November 2016

Results of conditional logistic regression testing for the effects of various factors on preferen...

Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detectable parameters and approach 2, later detectable parameters.

Olaf Rose (2813935)
Hugo Mennemann (2813944)
Carina John (2813947)
Marcus Lautenschläger (2813938)
Damaris Mertens-Keller (2813932)
Katharina Richling (2813965)
Isabel Waltering (2813941)
Stefanie Hamacher (2813956)
Moritz Felsch (2813953)
Lena Herich (116776)
Kathrin Czarnecki (2813962)
Corinna Schaffert (2813950)
Ulrich Jaehde (93895)
Juliane Köberlein-Neu (2813959)

June 2016

Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detecta...

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or never EV maximized in choices 38–47 and 88–97 in Study 2.

Nathaniel J. S. Ashby (4675825)
Kinneret Teodorescu (6503957)

March 2019

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or nev...

Experimental design and behavioural results.

Laurence T. Hunt (458000)
Mark W. Woolrich (458001)
Matthew F. S. Rushworth (458002)
Timothy E. J. Behrens (408036)

September 2013

(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or never EV maximized in choices 38–47 in Study 1.

Nathaniel J. S. Ashby (4675825)
Kinneret Teodorescu (6503957)

March 2019

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or nev...

Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analyses for the prediction of choice behavior.

Mathilde Descheemaeker (556090)
Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Dirk Hermans (441290)

April 2014

Note. Choice behavior was coded as 0 = water and 1 = beer. Continuous predictors were stan...

Logistic regression results showing significant predictors of LTP information preferences.

Laura Dennison (3151221)
Martina Brown (4898968)
Sarah Kirby (646602)
Ian Galea (3151215)

February 2018

Logistic regression results showing significant predictors of LTP information preferences.</p

Results of logistic regression for prediction of voting behavior, separately for decided and undecided voters.

Livio Raccuia (3216870)

October 2016

Results of logistic regression for prediction of voting behavior, separately for decided and unde...

Binary logistic regression model showing the effect of side of presentation, experience group, type of manipulation and interaction between group and type of manipulation on choices of the owner's face (S+) in the test trials of Experiment 2.

Elisa Pitteri (633775)
Paolo Mongillo (633776)
Paolo Carnier (633777)
Lieta Marinelli (633778)
Ludwig Huber (218979)

September 2014

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.Binary logistic regression model showing the...

Regression analyses Experiment 1.

Laura Fontanesi (13924781)
Amitai Shenhav (5143175)
Sebastian Gluth (478596)

October 2022

The left column shows the results of the logistic model fit on choice data, while the right column s...

Second choices in a visual span of apprehension task

Yellott, JI
Curnow, PF

July 1967

Four Ss were run in a visual span of apprehension experiment to determine whether second choices mad...

Stay probability transition-outcome interaction for Q(1) agent due to trial start action values.

Thomas Akam (836782)
Rui Costa (75687)
Peter Dayan (26734)

December 2015

(A) Predictor loadings for logistic regression model predicting whether the Q(1) ag...

Fig 3 -

Nathan Tardiff (6089168)
Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj (13924841)
Yale E. Cohen (13924844)
Joshua I. Gold (13119355)

October 2022

Logistic analysis of the bias (A) and adaptation-like (B) effects in the stimulus-based condition, a...

Experiments 1 and 2: Final models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Final models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 bas...

Experiments 1 and 2: Complete models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Complete models of logistic regressions predicting choosing on showups 2 and 3 ...

Results of conditional logistic regression testing for the effects of various factors on preference using the first choice made during trials.

Rebecca C. Wilcox (3243009)
Robert J. Fletcher Jr. (431571)

November 2016

Results of conditional logistic regression testing for the effects of various factors on preferen...

Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detectable parameters and approach 2, later detectable parameters.

Olaf Rose (2813935)
Hugo Mennemann (2813944)
Carina John (2813947)
Marcus Lautenschläger (2813938)
Damaris Mertens-Keller (2813932)
Katharina Richling (2813965)
Isabel Waltering (2813941)
Stefanie Hamacher (2813956)
Moritz Felsch (2813953)
Lena Herich (116776)
Kathrin Czarnecki (2813962)
Corinna Schaffert (2813950)
Ulrich Jaehde (93895)
Juliane Köberlein-Neu (2813959)

June 2016

Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detecta...

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or never EV maximized in choices 38–47 and 88–97 in Study 2.

Nathaniel J. S. Ashby (4675825)
Kinneret Teodorescu (6503957)

March 2019

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or nev...

Experimental design and behavioural results.

Laurence T. Hunt (458000)
Mark W. Woolrich (458001)
Matthew F. S. Rushworth (458002)
Timothy E. J. Behrens (408036)

September 2013

(A) Experimental timeline. The experiment contained two types of trial in which subjects chose be...

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or never EV maximized in choices 38–47 in Study 1.

Nathaniel J. S. Ashby (4675825)
Kinneret Teodorescu (6503957)

March 2019

Logistic regression predicting whether participants exhibiting 100% choice consistency always or nev...

Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analyses for the prediction of choice behavior.

Mathilde Descheemaeker (556090)
Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Dirk Hermans (441290)

April 2014

Note. Choice behavior was coded as 0 = water and 1 = beer. Continuous predictors were stan...

Logistic regression results showing significant predictors of LTP information preferences.

Laura Dennison (3151221)
Martina Brown (4898968)
Sarah Kirby (646602)
Ian Galea (3151215)

February 2018

Logistic regression results showing significant predictors of LTP information preferences.</p

Results of logistic regression for prediction of voting behavior, separately for decided and undecided voters.

Livio Raccuia (3216870)

October 2016

Results of logistic regression for prediction of voting behavior, separately for decided and unde...

Binary logistic regression model showing the effect of side of presentation, experience group, type of manipulation and interaction between group and type of manipulation on choices of the owner's face (S+) in the test trials of Experiment 2.

Elisa Pitteri (633775)
Paolo Mongillo (633776)
Paolo Carnier (633777)
Lieta Marinelli (633778)
Ludwig Huber (218979)

September 2014

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.Binary logistic regression model showing the...

Regression analyses Experiment 1.

Laura Fontanesi (13924781)
Amitai Shenhav (5143175)
Sebastian Gluth (478596)

October 2022

The left column shows the results of the logistic model fit on choice data, while the right column s...

Second choices in a visual span of apprehension task

Yellott, JI
Curnow, PF

July 1967

Four Ss were run in a visual span of apprehension experiment to determine whether second choices mad...

Stay probability transition-outcome interaction for Q(1) agent due to trial start action values.

Thomas Akam (836782)
Rui Costa (75687)
Peter Dayan (26734)

December 2015

(A) Predictor loadings for logistic regression model predicting whether the Q(1) ag...

Fig 3 -

Nathan Tardiff (6089168)
Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj (13924841)
Yale E. Cohen (13924844)
Joshua I. Gold (13119355)

October 2022

Logistic analysis of the bias (A) and adaptation-like (B) effects in the stimulus-based condition, a...

Experiment 3: Results of logistic regression predicting choosing on second and third recognition test trials based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Abstract

Extracted data

Experiment 3: Results of logistic regression predicting choosing on second and third recognition test trials based on previous choosing and target-presence.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items