Statistical testing for comparison of classification accuracy: aOne sample t-test: * and ** indicate p p < 0.01, respectively.</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
Accuracy results of MDT1and MDT2 compared to the proposed methods in the test stage, with different ...
<p>Comparisons were made by means of a one sided, paired t-test, testing the hypothesis that the err...
<p>Note:</p><p>*** p<0.01,</p><p>** p<0.05,</p><p>* p<0.1 corresponding to mean difference using a t...
<p>Inferential statistics for one-sample t-tests comparing approachability ratings in each context t...
Classification test accuracies in percents for the individual classifiers and for each data set in t...
<p>Performance for the different stimulus types in the present experiment and one-sample t tests aga...
<p>Statistics in percentage (%) of mean and standard deviation of 100 results of 100 repetitions of ...
Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group ...
<p>*statistically significantly better (p<0.05, t-test) as compared to the results with the original...
<p>Means, standard errors, and one-sample t-test against chance level of 0.25 for each taste categor...
Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.</p
Model-based accuracy of screening and diagnostic tests per category compared to the modelled true st...
<p>Results of t-tests comparing mean values of within-species size differences between regions to a ...
Related to Fig 6B One sample t-test (difference from 0) p value < 0.05 in red.</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
Accuracy results of MDT1and MDT2 compared to the proposed methods in the test stage, with different ...
<p>Comparisons were made by means of a one sided, paired t-test, testing the hypothesis that the err...
<p>Note:</p><p>*** p<0.01,</p><p>** p<0.05,</p><p>* p<0.1 corresponding to mean difference using a t...
<p>Inferential statistics for one-sample t-tests comparing approachability ratings in each context t...
Classification test accuracies in percents for the individual classifiers and for each data set in t...
<p>Performance for the different stimulus types in the present experiment and one-sample t tests aga...
<p>Statistics in percentage (%) of mean and standard deviation of 100 results of 100 repetitions of ...
Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group ...
<p>*statistically significantly better (p<0.05, t-test) as compared to the results with the original...
<p>Means, standard errors, and one-sample t-test against chance level of 0.25 for each taste categor...
Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.</p
Model-based accuracy of screening and diagnostic tests per category compared to the modelled true st...
<p>Results of t-tests comparing mean values of within-species size differences between regions to a ...
Related to Fig 6B One sample t-test (difference from 0) p value < 0.05 in red.</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p
Accuracy results of MDT1and MDT2 compared to the proposed methods in the test stage, with different ...
<p>Comparisons were made by means of a one sided, paired t-test, testing the hypothesis that the err...
DOI
Add to ORKG