Differences in model results based on the percent chance of agents staying home when sick.</p
Model predictions for participants choosing the predicted information compared to the alternative in...
Differences in observables between attritors and non-attritors across treatment groups.</p
Mixed effect model compares quality of care score at assessment round 2, 3 and 4 to baseline quality...
Differences in model results based on changes in the probability of infection in the model.</p
Difference-in-differences Weibull hazard model in the number of days voters’ voted earlier in 2020.<...
Characteristics of the patients in the present study compared to both models used.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of typhoid chronic carriage rates in literature vs. model predictions.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
<p>Differences between the sum of the stay probabilities for model-based agents following common ver...
Comparison results between the OLS and the GWR for the percentage of home deaths.</p
<p>Comparison of incidence rates and simulated values among the three different prediction models fo...
Mixed effect model compares quality of care score at assessment round 2, 3 and 4 to baseline quality...
<p>Survival models results for risk factors associated with treatment interruption.</p
<p>Results of the model fitting for the hypotheses on dominant immune modes of action.</p
Model predictions for participants choosing the predicted information compared to the alternative in...
Differences in observables between attritors and non-attritors across treatment groups.</p
Mixed effect model compares quality of care score at assessment round 2, 3 and 4 to baseline quality...
Differences in model results based on changes in the probability of infection in the model.</p
Difference-in-differences Weibull hazard model in the number of days voters’ voted earlier in 2020.<...
Characteristics of the patients in the present study compared to both models used.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
Comparison of typhoid chronic carriage rates in literature vs. model predictions.</p
Comparison of clinical features among patients in the modeling and validation groups (% or range).</...
<p>Differences between the sum of the stay probabilities for model-based agents following common ver...
Comparison results between the OLS and the GWR for the percentage of home deaths.</p
<p>Comparison of incidence rates and simulated values among the three different prediction models fo...
Mixed effect model compares quality of care score at assessment round 2, 3 and 4 to baseline quality...
<p>Survival models results for risk factors associated with treatment interruption.</p
<p>Results of the model fitting for the hypotheses on dominant immune modes of action.</p
Model predictions for participants choosing the predicted information compared to the alternative in...
Differences in observables between attritors and non-attritors across treatment groups.</p
Mixed effect model compares quality of care score at assessment round 2, 3 and 4 to baseline quality...
DOI
Add to ORKG