Performance characteristics of the GeneXpert assay compared to drug susceptibility testing for rifampicin (RIF).</p
<p>Sensitivity<b>-</b> 94.5% (88.6–97.4)</p><p>Specificity<b>-</b> 97.7% (95.4–98.9)</p><p>Positive ...
Performance characteristics of culture and PCR assays with the combined standard as reference.</p
The sensitivity and specificity of Stool Xpert for detection of rifampicin susceptibility compared w...
1<p>Comparison was carried out among 281 isolates.</p>2<p>Comparison was carried out among 276 isola...
*<p>DST: drug susceptibility test; RMP: rifampicin. McNemar χ<sup>2</sup> test, <i>P</i> = 0.5164, K...
<p>Diagnostic performance of GeneXpert against culture and smear as the reference standard.</p
Performance comparison between the BioFire FA-RP 2.1 and the reference RT-PCR tests according to the...
<p>Performance characteristics of the serological tests used in this study, as reported by the manuf...
<p>Comparing HIV-1 Drug Resistance Genotyping performance between ATCC and ViroSeq methods with diff...
<p>Comparison of molecular and phenotypic DST methods for detection of RIF susceptibility, n = 92.</...
<p>Pairwise comparisons of the three drug resistance detection techniques (DST, DNA sequencing, and ...
<p>Differences in yield of Xpert MTB/RIF assay test by sample or category of sample.</p
Test performance of the different diagnostic assays used for evaluating malaria positivity from bloo...
<p>Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay using sputum specimens to detect rifampicin resist...
<p>Abbreviations: RIF, rifampicin; DST, drug-susceptibility testing.</p><p>Detection of rifampicin r...
<p>Sensitivity<b>-</b> 94.5% (88.6–97.4)</p><p>Specificity<b>-</b> 97.7% (95.4–98.9)</p><p>Positive ...
Performance characteristics of culture and PCR assays with the combined standard as reference.</p
The sensitivity and specificity of Stool Xpert for detection of rifampicin susceptibility compared w...
1<p>Comparison was carried out among 281 isolates.</p>2<p>Comparison was carried out among 276 isola...
*<p>DST: drug susceptibility test; RMP: rifampicin. McNemar χ<sup>2</sup> test, <i>P</i> = 0.5164, K...
<p>Diagnostic performance of GeneXpert against culture and smear as the reference standard.</p
Performance comparison between the BioFire FA-RP 2.1 and the reference RT-PCR tests according to the...
<p>Performance characteristics of the serological tests used in this study, as reported by the manuf...
<p>Comparing HIV-1 Drug Resistance Genotyping performance between ATCC and ViroSeq methods with diff...
<p>Comparison of molecular and phenotypic DST methods for detection of RIF susceptibility, n = 92.</...
<p>Pairwise comparisons of the three drug resistance detection techniques (DST, DNA sequencing, and ...
<p>Differences in yield of Xpert MTB/RIF assay test by sample or category of sample.</p
Test performance of the different diagnostic assays used for evaluating malaria positivity from bloo...
<p>Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay using sputum specimens to detect rifampicin resist...
<p>Abbreviations: RIF, rifampicin; DST, drug-susceptibility testing.</p><p>Detection of rifampicin r...
<p>Sensitivity<b>-</b> 94.5% (88.6–97.4)</p><p>Specificity<b>-</b> 97.7% (95.4–98.9)</p><p>Positive ...
Performance characteristics of culture and PCR assays with the combined standard as reference.</p
The sensitivity and specificity of Stool Xpert for detection of rifampicin susceptibility compared w...