Model averaged estimates of top models predicting the proportion of time spent foraging, with 95% confidence intervals, based on the models within 2 ΔAICc of the top model (See S3 Table).</p
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
<p>(a) number of active foraging holes and (b) number of active physical trails observed at each vis...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
Model estimates of top model predicting the proportion of time spent vigilant, with 95% confidence i...
<p>Model averaged β coefficient, 95% confidence intervals and weights associated with habitat use th...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the top models predicting the number o...
<p>The table shows the summed <i>ω</i> (∑ω), the number of models in which the variable appears (Mod...
Model averaged estimates of models within 2 ΔAICc of the top model (See S2 Table) predicting the pro...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the two top models predicting nestling...
<p>Model 1 assumes uncorrelated abundances. Model 2 assumes correlated abundances among species of t...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the top models predicting brood reduct...
<p>ΔAIC indicates the difference between the best model and the same model adding (negative values) ...
<p>Models are ranked from lowest to highest ΔAICc (highest to lowest AICc weight, <sub>Wi</sub>).</p...
<p>Given are the coefficients with adjusted standard errors, lower and upper confidence intervals an...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
<p>(a) number of active foraging holes and (b) number of active physical trails observed at each vis...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
Model estimates of top model predicting the proportion of time spent vigilant, with 95% confidence i...
<p>Model averaged β coefficient, 95% confidence intervals and weights associated with habitat use th...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the top models predicting the number o...
<p>The table shows the summed <i>ω</i> (∑ω), the number of models in which the variable appears (Mod...
Model averaged estimates of models within 2 ΔAICc of the top model (See S2 Table) predicting the pro...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the two top models predicting nestling...
<p>Model 1 assumes uncorrelated abundances. Model 2 assumes correlated abundances among species of t...
<p>Averaged model estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the top models predicting brood reduct...
<p>ΔAIC indicates the difference between the best model and the same model adding (negative values) ...
<p>Models are ranked from lowest to highest ΔAICc (highest to lowest AICc weight, <sub>Wi</sub>).</p...
<p>Given are the coefficients with adjusted standard errors, lower and upper confidence intervals an...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...
<p>(a) number of active foraging holes and (b) number of active physical trails observed at each vis...
In ecology, the true causal structure for a given problem is often not known, and several plausible ...