(a)–(c) Results reconstructed using EPTV combining with 2-, 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators, respectively. Areas marked by dotted ellipses are the differences of the results between 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators. Even if combined with EPTV, the images reconstructed from more number of directions in gradient operators still have less artifacts.</p
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
<p>From left to right are cross-section, sagittal view and coronal view, respectively. Row (A): phan...
<p>(A) and (B) are the images reconstructed of the case one by the PWLS-PICCS () and PWLS-ndiTV () a...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using EPTV combined with 2-, 4-, a...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using EPTV combine...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using EPTV combine...
The image obtained from the 8-directional gradient operator has the best quantitative results.</p
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed abdomen images by using EPTV combined with 3-, 6-, and 26...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direction...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-dire...
<p>(A) is the image reconstructed by the FBP approach with ramp filter from the full noise-free proj...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
First row: (a) The exact Shepp-Logan phantom image on 85 × 85 grid. (b) The Shepp-Logan phantom imag...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
<p>From left to right are cross-section, sagittal view and coronal view, respectively. Row (A): phan...
<p>(A) and (B) are the images reconstructed of the case one by the PWLS-PICCS () and PWLS-ndiTV () a...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using EPTV combined with 2-, 4-, a...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using EPTV combine...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using EPTV combine...
The image obtained from the 8-directional gradient operator has the best quantitative results.</p
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed abdomen images by using EPTV combined with 3-, 6-, and 26...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direction...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-dire...
<p>(A) is the image reconstructed by the FBP approach with ramp filter from the full noise-free proj...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
First row: (a) The exact Shepp-Logan phantom image on 85 × 85 grid. (b) The Shepp-Logan phantom imag...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
<p>From left to right are cross-section, sagittal view and coronal view, respectively. Row (A): phan...
<p>(A) and (B) are the images reconstructed of the case one by the PWLS-PICCS () and PWLS-ndiTV () a...