(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators, respectively. Areas marked by dotted ellipses are the differences of the results between 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators. As it can be seen in (f), when sampling interval is 5°, 8-directional gradient operator gave the fewest artifacts.</p
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: (a) The exact Shepp-Logan phantom image on 85 × 85 grid. (b) The Shepp-Logan phantom imag...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
(a)–(c) Results reconstructed using EPTV combining with 2-, 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators...
The image obtained from the 8-directional gradient operator has the best quantitative results.</p
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-dire...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direction...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using EPTV combined with 2-, 4-, a...
Quantitative analysis of the abdomen image reconstructed using FBP, ART, 3-, 6-, and 26-directional ...
Quantitative analysis of the abdomen image reconstructed using FBP, ART, 3-, 6-, and 26-directional ...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
As the same in Figs 8–10, the images reconstructed from the 26-directional gradient operators have t...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: (a) The exact Shepp-Logan phantom image on 85 × 85 grid. (b) The Shepp-Logan phantom imag...
(a) Original Shepp-Logan phantom. (b)–(f) Results reconstructed using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direct...
(a)–(c) Results reconstructed using EPTV combining with 2-, 4-, and 8-directional gradient operators...
The image obtained from the 8-directional gradient operator has the best quantitative results.</p
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using FBP, ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-dire...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using ART, 2-, 4-, and 8-direction...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
Columns from left to right show the reconstructed image, Log(RMSE), PSNR and UQI after two thousand ...
Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed Shepp–Logan phantom by using EPTV combined with 2-, 4-, a...
Quantitative analysis of the abdomen image reconstructed using FBP, ART, 3-, 6-, and 26-directional ...
Quantitative analysis of the abdomen image reconstructed using FBP, ART, 3-, 6-, and 26-directional ...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
As the same in Figs 8–10, the images reconstructed from the 26-directional gradient operators have t...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: ground truth; subsequent rows from top to bottom: images reconstructed using FDK, ART, an...
First row: (a) The exact Shepp-Logan phantom image on 85 × 85 grid. (b) The Shepp-Logan phantom imag...