Comparison of time at the bench for full-volume and miniaturized protocols for 384 samples.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>Mean time per sample (combined preparation and cleaning) and 95% CI for the 4 different technique...
Hands-on times for the different molecular techniques considering an average.</p
<p>Comparison of protocols for the 2 benchmark studies presented in this paper.</p
<p>There are 20000 and 7000 samples in the Testing-A of hg19 and mm10 respectively.</p><p>Computatio...
Comparison of the lead time of the regular supplier and the backup supplier at different arrival int...
<p>Comparison of time and computing resources used by the compared binning methods.</p
<p>Comparison of mean sitting time (minutes) with respect to the characteristics of the analyzed pop...
Time to identification is ~7 minutes for the full Sepsityper® workflow compared to ~9 minutes for th...
<p>Comparison of running time (seconds) of the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (upper section) and ...
Univariate comparisons between visits with LOS ≧ 48 hours and LOS < 48 hours.</p
<p>Time comparison among different software for densest genomic models tested in the study.</p
Results of statistical comparisons between time-windows for the tested conditions of vibration.</p
Comparison of laboratory test orders between ICU A and B according to different periods1.</p
<p>Results of multiple comparisons of characteristic time of potential surrogates.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>Mean time per sample (combined preparation and cleaning) and 95% CI for the 4 different technique...
Hands-on times for the different molecular techniques considering an average.</p
<p>Comparison of protocols for the 2 benchmark studies presented in this paper.</p
<p>There are 20000 and 7000 samples in the Testing-A of hg19 and mm10 respectively.</p><p>Computatio...
Comparison of the lead time of the regular supplier and the backup supplier at different arrival int...
<p>Comparison of time and computing resources used by the compared binning methods.</p
<p>Comparison of mean sitting time (minutes) with respect to the characteristics of the analyzed pop...
Time to identification is ~7 minutes for the full Sepsityper® workflow compared to ~9 minutes for th...
<p>Comparison of running time (seconds) of the algorithms implemented in MATLAB (upper section) and ...
Univariate comparisons between visits with LOS ≧ 48 hours and LOS < 48 hours.</p
<p>Time comparison among different software for densest genomic models tested in the study.</p
Results of statistical comparisons between time-windows for the tested conditions of vibration.</p
Comparison of laboratory test orders between ICU A and B according to different periods1.</p
<p>Results of multiple comparisons of characteristic time of potential surrogates.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
<p>Mean time per sample (combined preparation and cleaning) and 95% CI for the 4 different technique...
Hands-on times for the different molecular techniques considering an average.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG