Effects of the first level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percentage).

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.

Ivan Simko (5109122)
Ryan J. Hayes (211993)

April 2018

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.</p

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis population).

Sifrash Meseret Gelaw (16548248)
Sandra V. Kik (14312607)
Morten Ruhwald (94660)
Stefano Ongarello (4428046)
Tesfa Semagne Egzertegegne (16548251)
Olga Gorbacheva (5688884)
Christopher Gilpin (9181481)
Nina Marano (212412)
Scott Lee (540187)
Christina R. Phares (3591833)
Victoria Medina (13837693)
Bhaskar Amatya (16548254)
Claudia M. Denkinger (8790434)

July 2023

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis popul...

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.

Mizuho Nishio (4047580)
Kazuaki Nakane (4047577)
Takeshi Kubo (307061)
Masahiro Yakami (4047586)
Yutaka Emoto (4047574)
Mari Nishio (4047583)
Kaori Togashi (508745)

May 2017

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.</p

Effects of the second level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percentage).

Daniel Motta (6204464)
Alex Álisson Bandeira Santos (6204467)
Ingrid Winkler (6204470)
Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado (657245)
Daniel André Dias Imperial Pereira (6204473)
Alexandre Morais Cavalcanti (6204476)
Eduardo Oyama Lins Fonseca (6204479)
Frank Kirchner (6204482)
Roberto Badaró (6204485)

January 2019

Effects of the second level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percen...

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.

Dorottya Rusz (5819774)
Erik Bijleveld (177088)
Michiel A. J. Kompier (2586820)

October 2018

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.

L. Beynel (6499007)
S. W. Davis (6499010)
C. A. Crowell (6499013)
S. A. Hilbig (6499016)
W. Lim (6499019)
D. Nguyen (6499022)
H. Palmer (6499025)
A. Brito (2906399)
A. V. Peterchev (6499028)
B. Luber (6499031)
S. H. Lisanby (6499034)
R. Cabeza (6499037)
L. G. Appelbaum (6499040)

March 2019

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.</p

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.

L. Beynel (6499007)
S. W. Davis (6499010)
C. A. Crowell (6499013)
S. A. Hilbig (6499016)
W. Lim (6499019)
D. Nguyen (6499022)
H. Palmer (6499025)
A. Brito (2906399)
A. V. Peterchev (6499028)
B. Luber (6499031)
S. H. Lisanby (6499034)
R. Cabeza (6499037)
L. G. Appelbaum (6499040)

March 2019

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.</p

Participants' mean accuracy rates (%) for each condition (with standard deviations).

Shahd Al-Janabi (304354)
Colin MacLeod (304355)
Gillian Rhodes (261602)

February 2013

Participants' mean accuracy rates (%) for each condition (with standard deviations).</p

ANOVA results showing the impact on accuracy for each of the evaluated variables.

Daniel Castillo (2608138)
Juan Manuel Galvez (6325697)
Luis J. Herrera (5082503)
Fernando Rojas (6325700)
Olga Valenzuela (5211047)
Octavio Caba (811156)
Jose Prados (778445)
Ignacio Rojas (5059148)

February 2019

ANOVA results showing the impact on accuracy for each of the evaluated variables.</p

Average influence of ratio of training samples on accuracy with INysCK and MINysCK and corresponding classifiers used.

Changming Zhu (3150798)
Xiang Ji (324865)
Chao Chen (195669)
Rigui Zhou (5931941)
Lai Wei (36699)
Xiafen Zhang (5931944)

November 2018

Average influence of ratio of training samples on accuracy with INysCK and MINysCK and corresponding...

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, and culture; values in brackets represent standard error.

Jan W. de Fockert (309686)
Serge Caparos (341478)
Karina J. Linnell (341479)
Jules Davidoff (341480)

February 2013

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, a...

Mean accuracy (in percentages) and reaction times (in ms) per condition (standard deviations in parentheses).

Irit Bar-Kochva (164375)
Zvia Breznitz (164379)

May 2012

Mean accuracy (in percentages) and reaction times (in ms) per condition (standard deviations in p...

Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group (with standard error in parentheses).

Christine Xiang Ru Leong (5832425)
Jessica M. Price (5832428)
Nicola J. Pitchford (460106)
Walter J. B. van Heuven (400667)

October 2018

Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group ...

Accuracy estimates for the different corrections at the 7 coverage levels.

Dineika Chandrananda (516712)
Natalie P. Thorne (80449)
Devika Ganesamoorthy (362172)
Damien L. Bruno (362168)
Yuval Benjamini (516713)
Terence P. Speed (132229)
Howard R. Slater (362181)
Melanie Bahlo (54258)

January 2014

Accuracy estimates for the different corrections at the 7 coverage levels.</p

Accuracy values at different m values for participants K3, K6 and L1. The mean accuracy value peaked at m = 7 for all three participants.

Sheng Ge (581229)
Ruimin Wang (317092)
Dongchuan Yu (285660)

June 2014

Accuracy values at different m values for participants K3, K6 and L1. The mean accuracy value pea...

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.

Ivan Simko (5109122)
Ryan J. Hayes (211993)

April 2018

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.</p

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis population).

Sifrash Meseret Gelaw (16548248)
Sandra V. Kik (14312607)
Morten Ruhwald (94660)
Stefano Ongarello (4428046)
Tesfa Semagne Egzertegegne (16548251)
Olga Gorbacheva (5688884)
Christopher Gilpin (9181481)
Nina Marano (212412)
Scott Lee (540187)
Christina R. Phares (3591833)
Victoria Medina (13837693)
Bhaskar Amatya (16548254)
Claudia M. Denkinger (8790434)

July 2023

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis popul...

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.

Mizuho Nishio (4047580)
Kazuaki Nakane (4047577)
Takeshi Kubo (307061)
Masahiro Yakami (4047586)
Yutaka Emoto (4047574)
Mari Nishio (4047583)
Kaori Togashi (508745)

May 2017

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.</p

Effects of the second level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percentage).

Daniel Motta (6204464)
Alex Álisson Bandeira Santos (6204467)
Ingrid Winkler (6204470)
Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado (657245)
Daniel André Dias Imperial Pereira (6204473)
Alexandre Morais Cavalcanti (6204476)
Eduardo Oyama Lins Fonseca (6204479)
Frank Kirchner (6204482)
Roberto Badaró (6204485)

January 2019

Effects of the second level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percen...

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.

Dorottya Rusz (5819774)
Erik Bijleveld (177088)
Michiel A. J. Kompier (2586820)

October 2018

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.

L. Beynel (6499007)
S. W. Davis (6499010)
C. A. Crowell (6499013)
S. A. Hilbig (6499016)
W. Lim (6499019)
D. Nguyen (6499022)
H. Palmer (6499025)
A. Brito (2906399)
A. V. Peterchev (6499028)
B. Luber (6499031)
S. H. Lisanby (6499034)
R. Cabeza (6499037)
L. G. Appelbaum (6499040)

March 2019

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.</p

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.

L. Beynel (6499007)
S. W. Davis (6499010)
C. A. Crowell (6499013)
S. A. Hilbig (6499016)
W. Lim (6499019)
D. Nguyen (6499022)
H. Palmer (6499025)
A. Brito (2906399)
A. V. Peterchev (6499028)
B. Luber (6499031)
S. H. Lisanby (6499034)
R. Cabeza (6499037)
L. G. Appelbaum (6499040)

March 2019

Summary of mean accuracy and standard error for the significant main effects.</p

Participants' mean accuracy rates (%) for each condition (with standard deviations).

Shahd Al-Janabi (304354)
Colin MacLeod (304355)
Gillian Rhodes (261602)

February 2013

Participants' mean accuracy rates (%) for each condition (with standard deviations).</p

ANOVA results showing the impact on accuracy for each of the evaluated variables.

Daniel Castillo (2608138)
Juan Manuel Galvez (6325697)
Luis J. Herrera (5082503)
Fernando Rojas (6325700)
Olga Valenzuela (5211047)
Octavio Caba (811156)
Jose Prados (778445)
Ignacio Rojas (5059148)

February 2019

ANOVA results showing the impact on accuracy for each of the evaluated variables.</p

Average influence of ratio of training samples on accuracy with INysCK and MINysCK and corresponding classifiers used.

Changming Zhu (3150798)
Xiang Ji (324865)
Chao Chen (195669)
Rigui Zhou (5931941)
Lai Wei (36699)
Xiafen Zhang (5931944)

November 2018

Average influence of ratio of training samples on accuracy with INysCK and MINysCK and corresponding...

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, and culture; values in brackets represent standard error.

Jan W. de Fockert (309686)
Serge Caparos (341478)
Karina J. Linnell (341479)
Jules Davidoff (341480)

February 2013

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, a...

Mean accuracy (in percentages) and reaction times (in ms) per condition (standard deviations in parentheses).

Irit Bar-Kochva (164375)
Zvia Breznitz (164379)

May 2012

Mean accuracy (in percentages) and reaction times (in ms) per condition (standard deviations in p...

Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group (with standard error in parentheses).

Christine Xiang Ru Leong (5832425)
Jessica M. Price (5832428)
Nicola J. Pitchford (460106)
Walter J. B. van Heuven (400667)

October 2018

Mean percentage of correct identification in pre- and post-tests for each stimulus set and L1 group ...

Accuracy estimates for the different corrections at the 7 coverage levels.

Dineika Chandrananda (516712)
Natalie P. Thorne (80449)
Devika Ganesamoorthy (362172)
Damien L. Bruno (362168)
Yuval Benjamini (516713)
Terence P. Speed (132229)
Howard R. Slater (362181)
Melanie Bahlo (54258)

January 2014

Accuracy estimates for the different corrections at the 7 coverage levels.</p

Accuracy values at different m values for participants K3, K6 and L1. The mean accuracy value peaked at m = 7 for all three participants.

Sheng Ge (581229)
Ruimin Wang (317092)
Dongchuan Yu (285660)

June 2014

Accuracy values at different m values for participants K3, K6 and L1. The mean accuracy value pea...

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.

Ivan Simko (5109122)
Ryan J. Hayes (211993)

April 2018

Effect of rater’s experience on accuracy and reliability of visual ratings.</p

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis population).

Sifrash Meseret Gelaw (16548248)
Sandra V. Kik (14312607)
Morten Ruhwald (94660)
Stefano Ongarello (4428046)
Tesfa Semagne Egzertegegne (16548251)
Olga Gorbacheva (5688884)
Christopher Gilpin (9181481)
Nina Marano (212412)
Scott Lee (540187)
Christina R. Phares (3591833)
Victoria Medina (13837693)
Bhaskar Amatya (16548254)
Claudia M. Denkinger (8790434)

July 2023

Accuracy estimates of index test at different sensitivity and specificity points (MRS analysis popul...

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.

Mizuho Nishio (4047580)
Kazuaki Nakane (4047577)
Takeshi Kubo (307061)
Masahiro Yakami (4047586)
Yutaka Emoto (4047574)
Mari Nishio (4047583)
Kaori Togashi (508745)

May 2017

Effect of the threshold level on the predictive accuracy of CLAA% for visual score.</p

Effects of the first level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percentage).

Abstract

Extracted data

Effects of the first level parameters on the accuracy of the testing phase (average accuracy percentage).

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items