Samples Control A and Control B are control samples. Samples Source1 and Source2 were taken from the predicted source of the infection. Samples Patient1-7 belong to the infected patients who were treated at SCMZ. A scale bar representing the expected number of substitutions per sites is shown at the bottom. Branch labels show bootstrap values higher than 70.</p
<p>All isolates were clustered into three distinct groups. Countries where the sample collection ori...
<p>The phylogenetic trees generated from the alignments on the whole genome (A), the U<sub>L</sub> r...
<p>The neighbor-joining tree was calculated from 1,056 concatenated and multiple aligned core genome...
<p>A phylogenetic tree was constructed from multiple alignment of the core genome SNPs of the 6 isol...
<p>The tree was computed using PhyML with the GTR model for nucleotide substitutions. Numbers above ...
<p>Patient-related clusters are identified in different colors as indicated at the bottom of the fig...
<p>The maximum likelihood tree was inferred using the GTRGAMMA substitution model and is based on a ...
<p>Numbers indicate bootstrap values inferred after 1,000 pseudoreplicates and Bayesian Posterior Pr...
<p>Maximum-likelihood analysis in combination with 1000 bootstrap replicates was used to derive tree...
<p>The reference strains were selected based on geographical and chronological distributions. The ph...
<p>The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. The bootstrap values o...
<p>Bootstrap support values (1000 replicates) for nodes higher than 50% are indicated next to the co...
<p>This phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap probabilities (%...
<p>The dashed line indicates the cut-off of 70%. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were cons...
<p>The reference strains were selected based on geographical and chronological distributions. The ph...
<p>All isolates were clustered into three distinct groups. Countries where the sample collection ori...
<p>The phylogenetic trees generated from the alignments on the whole genome (A), the U<sub>L</sub> r...
<p>The neighbor-joining tree was calculated from 1,056 concatenated and multiple aligned core genome...
<p>A phylogenetic tree was constructed from multiple alignment of the core genome SNPs of the 6 isol...
<p>The tree was computed using PhyML with the GTR model for nucleotide substitutions. Numbers above ...
<p>Patient-related clusters are identified in different colors as indicated at the bottom of the fig...
<p>The maximum likelihood tree was inferred using the GTRGAMMA substitution model and is based on a ...
<p>Numbers indicate bootstrap values inferred after 1,000 pseudoreplicates and Bayesian Posterior Pr...
<p>Maximum-likelihood analysis in combination with 1000 bootstrap replicates was used to derive tree...
<p>The reference strains were selected based on geographical and chronological distributions. The ph...
<p>The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. The bootstrap values o...
<p>Bootstrap support values (1000 replicates) for nodes higher than 50% are indicated next to the co...
<p>This phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap probabilities (%...
<p>The dashed line indicates the cut-off of 70%. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were cons...
<p>The reference strains were selected based on geographical and chronological distributions. The ph...
<p>All isolates were clustered into three distinct groups. Countries where the sample collection ori...
<p>The phylogenetic trees generated from the alignments on the whole genome (A), the U<sub>L</sub> r...
<p>The neighbor-joining tree was calculated from 1,056 concatenated and multiple aligned core genome...