The thick (inner) bars represent +/- 1 standard error, while the thin (outer) bars represent +/- 2 standard errors. T5: bare land; DW: distance to water body; T1: dense shrubland; T4: woodland; DV: distance to vera. The reference categories for the categorical predictors were: (i) Year-2011, (ii) Hour-1, and (iii) Season-1.</p
Site use (ψ), detection probability (p and r), and species interaction factors (SIF–phi and delta) p...
<p>Â-coefficient estimates for covariates strength and direction of influence are also shown.</p><p>...
While reliable estimates of species abundance distribution are required for wildlife management and ...
Predicting the likelihood of wildlife presence at potential wildlife-livestock interfaces is challen...
Predicting the likelihood of wildlife presence at potential wildlife-livestock interfaces is challen...
Factors affecting the likelihood of badger visits (top) and the frequency of badger visits at farms ...
List of the top-five single-species single-season occupancy models fit for wild boar Sus scrofa in r...
<p>Dots represent the mean of probability at a distance, and error bars represent confidence interva...
Results of the best-fitting generalised mixed linear model (negative binomial distribution and log l...
<p>(A) interaction season × proportion of grazing lawns, (B) interaction season × proportion of seep...
<p>Means and standard errors of the means for bins of summer temperature (ranges of 1 degree) and de...
<p>Coefficients are shown for the most parsimonious models according to AIC. Measures for model supp...
Predictive models of cattle behavior were developed by applying multiple regression analysis to a bo...
The population density of wildlife reservoirs contributes to disease transmission risk for domestic...
<p>Model-averaged (over the set of 4096 candidate regression models) standardized regression coeffic...
Site use (ψ), detection probability (p and r), and species interaction factors (SIF–phi and delta) p...
<p>Â-coefficient estimates for covariates strength and direction of influence are also shown.</p><p>...
While reliable estimates of species abundance distribution are required for wildlife management and ...
Predicting the likelihood of wildlife presence at potential wildlife-livestock interfaces is challen...
Predicting the likelihood of wildlife presence at potential wildlife-livestock interfaces is challen...
Factors affecting the likelihood of badger visits (top) and the frequency of badger visits at farms ...
List of the top-five single-species single-season occupancy models fit for wild boar Sus scrofa in r...
<p>Dots represent the mean of probability at a distance, and error bars represent confidence interva...
Results of the best-fitting generalised mixed linear model (negative binomial distribution and log l...
<p>(A) interaction season × proportion of grazing lawns, (B) interaction season × proportion of seep...
<p>Means and standard errors of the means for bins of summer temperature (ranges of 1 degree) and de...
<p>Coefficients are shown for the most parsimonious models according to AIC. Measures for model supp...
Predictive models of cattle behavior were developed by applying multiple regression analysis to a bo...
The population density of wildlife reservoirs contributes to disease transmission risk for domestic...
<p>Model-averaged (over the set of 4096 candidate regression models) standardized regression coeffic...
Site use (ψ), detection probability (p and r), and species interaction factors (SIF–phi and delta) p...
<p>Â-coefficient estimates for covariates strength and direction of influence are also shown.</p><p>...
While reliable estimates of species abundance distribution are required for wildlife management and ...