Additional file 10. Fig. S6: Heatmaps of predicted values of all possible single-crosses hybrids at Piracicaba with ideal nitrogen availability (PI.IN). a, b Ear height predicted using the additive and additive-dominance models; c, d Grain yield predicted using the additive and additive-dominance models. Lines and columns of each plot were sorted by the mean performance of parental inbred lines at all crosses considering the predicted values predicted in the Additive model
Additional file 3. Fig. S1: Number of crosses in which each one of the 49 inbred lines occurred
Additional file 6. Fig. S3: Posterior density of the covariance between the additive and nonadditive...
Additional file 15. Tables S7 and S8: Comparison of posterior means of variance parameters and broad...
Additional file 9. Fig. S5: Heatmaps of predicted values of all possible single-crosses hybrids at P...
Additional file 11. Fig. S7: Heatmaps of predicted values of all possible single-crosses hybrids at ...
Additional file 18. Fig. S13: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 19. Fig. S14: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 8. Fig. S4: Scatter plots of the prediction accuracies obtained by the Aâ+âD mod...
Additional file 13. Fig. S9: Linearity among prediction accuracy ( $$r_{{y\hat{y}}}$$ r y y ^ ) and ...
Additional file 17. Fig. S12: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 14. Fig. S10: Cross-validation prediction accuracy ( $$r_{yy}^{{}}$$ r yy ) versus b...
This dataset encompasses the non-adjusted phenotypes dataset and the genotypic data from 49 maize in...
Additional file 4. Fig. S2: Boxplots of the pairwise linkage disequilibrium (r2) by distance (Kbp) f...
This dataset encompasses the adjusted phenotypes and the relationship matrices (additive, dominance,...
Additional file 12. Fig. S8: Population structure of 49 inbred lines in maize. a Cumulative proporti...
Additional file 3. Fig. S1: Number of crosses in which each one of the 49 inbred lines occurred
Additional file 6. Fig. S3: Posterior density of the covariance between the additive and nonadditive...
Additional file 15. Tables S7 and S8: Comparison of posterior means of variance parameters and broad...
Additional file 9. Fig. S5: Heatmaps of predicted values of all possible single-crosses hybrids at P...
Additional file 11. Fig. S7: Heatmaps of predicted values of all possible single-crosses hybrids at ...
Additional file 18. Fig. S13: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 19. Fig. S14: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 8. Fig. S4: Scatter plots of the prediction accuracies obtained by the Aâ+âD mod...
Additional file 13. Fig. S9: Linearity among prediction accuracy ( $$r_{{y\hat{y}}}$$ r y y ^ ) and ...
Additional file 17. Fig. S12: Boxplots of the posterior distribution of expected hybrid performance ...
Additional file 14. Fig. S10: Cross-validation prediction accuracy ( $$r_{yy}^{{}}$$ r yy ) versus b...
This dataset encompasses the non-adjusted phenotypes dataset and the genotypic data from 49 maize in...
Additional file 4. Fig. S2: Boxplots of the pairwise linkage disequilibrium (r2) by distance (Kbp) f...
This dataset encompasses the adjusted phenotypes and the relationship matrices (additive, dominance,...
Additional file 12. Fig. S8: Population structure of 49 inbred lines in maize. a Cumulative proporti...
Additional file 3. Fig. S1: Number of crosses in which each one of the 49 inbred lines occurred
Additional file 6. Fig. S3: Posterior density of the covariance between the additive and nonadditive...
Additional file 15. Tables S7 and S8: Comparison of posterior means of variance parameters and broad...