Figure S5. Funnel plot indicates significant publication bias regarding mPAP in animal studies of PAH. (TIF 347 kb
Additional file 5: Fig. S10. Sensitivity analyses: a) survival rate, b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 6: Fig. S11. Funnel plots for (a) survival rate, (b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 1: Table S1: The study quality of animal studies; Figure S1: Publication bias of the...
Figure S6. Funnel plot indicates no significant publication bias regarding mPAP in animal studies of...
Figure S7. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S8. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S9. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S10. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies fo...
Figure S3. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S4. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S1. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S2. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S1. Post hoc analysis of RVSP using mean difference (MD). Figure S2. Post hoc analysis of RVS...
Quality assessment. (A) Risk of bias summary. (B) Risk of bias graph. (PPTX 76Â kb
Figure S1. Forest plot showing the effect of stem cell therapy on amputation rate in DM subgroup. (D...
Additional file 5: Fig. S10. Sensitivity analyses: a) survival rate, b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 6: Fig. S11. Funnel plots for (a) survival rate, (b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 1: Table S1: The study quality of animal studies; Figure S1: Publication bias of the...
Figure S6. Funnel plot indicates no significant publication bias regarding mPAP in animal studies of...
Figure S7. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S8. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S9. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies for...
Figure S10. Funnel plots demonstrating no significant publication bias among the included studies fo...
Figure S3. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S4. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S1. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S2. Meta-analysis of overall pooled WMDs with 95% CIs across studies for secondary outcomes i...
Figure S1. Post hoc analysis of RVSP using mean difference (MD). Figure S2. Post hoc analysis of RVS...
Quality assessment. (A) Risk of bias summary. (B) Risk of bias graph. (PPTX 76Â kb
Figure S1. Forest plot showing the effect of stem cell therapy on amputation rate in DM subgroup. (D...
Additional file 5: Fig. S10. Sensitivity analyses: a) survival rate, b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 6: Fig. S11. Funnel plots for (a) survival rate, (b) pulmonary fibrosis scores
Additional file 1: Table S1: The study quality of animal studies; Figure S1: Publication bias of the...
DOI
Add to ORKG