Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Additional file 1: of Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

Munyaradzi Dimairo (363009)
Jonathan Boote (3439259)
Steven Julious (3373859)
Jonathan Nicholl (821179)
Susan Todd (55505)

September 2015

‘Interview guide’; Description of data ‘A guide to the interview process’. (PDF 112 kb

Additional file 2: of Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Heather Ames (3490847)
Claire Glenton (27067)
Simon Lewin (176675)

February 2019

Study characteristics addressed in the CERQual concept of relevance. This table presents the differe...

Additional file 7: Table S1. of Estimating the accuracy of muscle response testing: two randomised-order blinded studies

Anne Jensen (3415013)
Richard Stevens (715814)
Amanda Burls (85818)

November 2016

Demographics of Practitioners - Experiments 1 & 2. Table S2. 2x2 Table for MRT for each Pair (n=48) ...

Additional file 1: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Carl Heneghan (185988)

February 2019

Full table of examples of trialistsâ inaccurate statements. References are to correspondence archi...

Additional file 2: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Carl Heneghan (185988)

February 2019

Full table of examples of trialistsâ response styles. References are to correspondence archive at ...

Additional file 3: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Anna Powell-Smith (5390573)
Carl Heneghan (185988)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)

February 2019

Full archive of all underlying raw coding sheets for each individual trial as available at www.COMPa...

Additional file 2: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Goldacre, Ben
Drysdale, Henry
Dale, Aaron
Milosevic, Ioan
Slade, Eirion
Hartley, Philip
Marston, Cicely
Powell-Smith, Anna
Heneghan, Carl
Mahtani, Kamal R

February 2019

Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials....

Additional file 1: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Anna Powell-Smith (5390573)
Carl Heneghan (185988)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)

February 2019

a General template letter. b Template letter to the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). c Templa...

Additional file 3: of Comparison of treatment effect sizes from pivotal and postapproval trials of novel therapeutics approved by the FDA based on surrogate markers of disease: a meta-epidemiological study

Joshua Wallach (4741575)
Oriana Ciani (4485976)
Alison Pease (4991474)
Gregg S. Gonsalves (731654)
Harlan Krumholz (3401270)
Rod Taylor (25312)
Joseph Ross (3435704)

March 2018

Table S1. Pivotal trials with at least one postapproval trial with a patient-relevant outcome. (XLSX...

Additional file 1: of Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability

Andrija Babic (6561632)
Ruzica Tokalic (6561647)
JoĂŁo AmĂlcar Silva Cunha (6561674)
Ivana Novak (293544)
Jelena Suto (6561656)
Marin Vidak (6561662)
Ivana Miosic (6561665)
Ivana Vuka (6561668)
Tina Poklepovic Pericic (6561671)
Livia Puljak (319057)

April 2019

Table S1. A list of included and excluded studies with a serial number of each record. The supplemen...

Additional file 1: of Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish

Paola Rosati (3414545)
Franz Porzsolt (3414554)
Gabriella Ricciotti (3414539)
Giuseppina Testa (3414530)
Rita Inglese (3414560)
Ferruccio Giustini (3414557)
Ersilia Fiscarelli (3414533)
Marco Zazza (3106002)
Cecilia Carlino (3414551)
Valerio Balassone (3414536)
Roberto Fiorito (3414542)
Roberto DâAmico (3414548)

September 2016

Inconsistencies in the 20 trials published in the journal Pediatrics from July to November 2013, and...

Additional file 2: of Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

Munyaradzi Dimairo (363009)
Jonathan Boote (3439259)
Steven Julious (3373859)
Jonathan Nicholl (821179)
Susan Todd (55505)

September 2015

‘Supplementary interviews data supporting themes and shared case studies of adaptive designs’; Descr...

Additional file 1: of A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes

Doneal Thomas (3269046)
Robert Platt (507752)
Andrea Benedetti (139371)

February 2017

Median (Interquartile range (IQR)) absolute bias (%) for treatment effect, Î˛1 for different approac...

Additional file 1: of Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Heather Ames (3490847)
Claire Glenton (27067)
Simon Lewin (176675)

February 2019

Overview of sampling stage and contribution to findings for primary studies included in the Qualitat...

Additional file 1: of Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review

Samantha Trace (4622506)
Simon Kolstoe (4622509)

November 2017

Qualitative methods and list of themes. Description of analysis methods originally used and tables o...

Additional file 1: of Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

Munyaradzi Dimairo (363009)
Jonathan Boote (3439259)
Steven Julious (3373859)
Jonathan Nicholl (821179)
Susan Todd (55505)

September 2015

‘Interview guide’; Description of data ‘A guide to the interview process’. (PDF 112 kb

Additional file 2: of Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Heather Ames (3490847)
Claire Glenton (27067)
Simon Lewin (176675)

February 2019

Study characteristics addressed in the CERQual concept of relevance. This table presents the differe...

Additional file 7: Table S1. of Estimating the accuracy of muscle response testing: two randomised-order blinded studies

Anne Jensen (3415013)
Richard Stevens (715814)
Amanda Burls (85818)

November 2016

Demographics of Practitioners - Experiments 1 & 2. Table S2. 2x2 Table for MRT for each Pair (n=48) ...

Additional file 1: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Carl Heneghan (185988)

February 2019

Full table of examples of trialistsâ inaccurate statements. References are to correspondence archi...

Additional file 2: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Carl Heneghan (185988)

February 2019

Full table of examples of trialistsâ response styles. References are to correspondence archive at ...

Additional file 3: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Anna Powell-Smith (5390573)
Carl Heneghan (185988)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)

February 2019

Full archive of all underlying raw coding sheets for each individual trial as available at www.COMPa...

Additional file 2: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Goldacre, Ben
Drysdale, Henry
Dale, Aaron
Milosevic, Ioan
Slade, Eirion
Hartley, Philip
Marston, Cicely
Powell-Smith, Anna
Heneghan, Carl
Mahtani, Kamal R

February 2019

Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials....

Additional file 1: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Ben Goldacre (464528)
Henry Drysdale (6332507)
Aaron Dale (6332510)
Ioan Milosevic (6332513)
Eirion Slade (6332516)
Philip Hartley (6332519)
Cicely Marston (126530)
Anna Powell-Smith (5390573)
Carl Heneghan (185988)
Kamal Mahtani (5560220)

February 2019

a General template letter. b Template letter to the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). c Templa...

Additional file 3: of Comparison of treatment effect sizes from pivotal and postapproval trials of novel therapeutics approved by the FDA based on surrogate markers of disease: a meta-epidemiological study

Joshua Wallach (4741575)
Oriana Ciani (4485976)
Alison Pease (4991474)
Gregg S. Gonsalves (731654)
Harlan Krumholz (3401270)
Rod Taylor (25312)
Joseph Ross (3435704)

March 2018

Table S1. Pivotal trials with at least one postapproval trial with a patient-relevant outcome. (XLSX...

Additional file 1: of Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability

Andrija Babic (6561632)
Ruzica Tokalic (6561647)
JoĂŁo AmĂlcar Silva Cunha (6561674)
Ivana Novak (293544)
Jelena Suto (6561656)
Marin Vidak (6561662)
Ivana Miosic (6561665)
Ivana Vuka (6561668)
Tina Poklepovic Pericic (6561671)
Livia Puljak (319057)

April 2019

Table S1. A list of included and excluded studies with a serial number of each record. The supplemen...

Additional file 1: of Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish

Paola Rosati (3414545)
Franz Porzsolt (3414554)
Gabriella Ricciotti (3414539)
Giuseppina Testa (3414530)
Rita Inglese (3414560)
Ferruccio Giustini (3414557)
Ersilia Fiscarelli (3414533)
Marco Zazza (3106002)
Cecilia Carlino (3414551)
Valerio Balassone (3414536)
Roberto Fiorito (3414542)
Roberto DâAmico (3414548)

September 2016

Inconsistencies in the 20 trials published in the journal Pediatrics from July to November 2013, and...

Additional file 2: of Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

Munyaradzi Dimairo (363009)
Jonathan Boote (3439259)
Steven Julious (3373859)
Jonathan Nicholl (821179)
Susan Todd (55505)

September 2015

‘Supplementary interviews data supporting themes and shared case studies of adaptive designs’; Descr...

Additional file 1: of A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes

Doneal Thomas (3269046)
Robert Platt (507752)
Andrea Benedetti (139371)

February 2017

Median (Interquartile range (IQR)) absolute bias (%) for treatment effect, Î˛1 for different approac...

Additional file 1: of Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Heather Ames (3490847)
Claire Glenton (27067)
Simon Lewin (176675)

February 2019

Overview of sampling stage and contribution to findings for primary studies included in the Qualitat...

Additional file 1: of Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review

Samantha Trace (4622506)
Simon Kolstoe (4622509)

November 2017

Qualitative methods and list of themes. Description of analysis methods originally used and tables o...

Additional file 1: of Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials

Munyaradzi Dimairo (363009)
Jonathan Boote (3439259)
Steven Julious (3373859)
Jonathan Nicholl (821179)
Susan Todd (55505)

September 2015

‘Interview guide’; Description of data ‘A guide to the interview process’. (PDF 112 kb

Additional file 2: of Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Heather Ames (3490847)
Claire Glenton (27067)
Simon Lewin (176675)

February 2019

Study characteristics addressed in the CERQual concept of relevance. This table presents the differe...

Additional file 7: Table S1. of Estimating the accuracy of muscle response testing: two randomised-order blinded studies

Anne Jensen (3415013)
Richard Stevens (715814)
Amanda Burls (85818)

November 2016

Demographics of Practitioners - Experiments 1 & 2. Table S2. 2x2 Table for MRT for each Pair (n=48) ...

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Abstract

Extracted data

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Abstract

Extracted data

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Additional file 3: of COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchersâ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials