The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95% CI for each study and the final combined results are displayed numerically on the left and graphically as a forest plot on the right. A and B are based on univariate analysis and multivariate analysis data, respectively. A subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of ethnicity; the results are shown in C. The sensitivity analysis results are shown in D.</p
Significant differences between compared BMI groups according to multivariate logistic regression an...
<p>Squares indicate study-specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study-specific st...
<p>Calculation based on fix effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) a...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary odds ratio was calculated using a fixed-effects model. The odds ratio and 95% CI for eac...
The summary odds ratio was calculated using a random-effects model. The odds ratio and 95% CI for ea...
<p>Calculation based on random effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD...
<p>A: Total subjects from the Subgroup1 B: Males from the Subgroup 1 C: Females from the Subgroup 1 ...
<p>A. <i>RBMS1</i>-<i>TANK</i> locus and B. <i>TSPYL5</i> locus. The overall inverse—variance-weight...
Results of subgroup analyses of the association between mean difference in BMI and NEAP according to...
<p>BMI calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.</p>a<p>Adjusted estima...
Significant differences between compared BMI groups according to multivariate logistic regression an...
<p>Squares indicate study-specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study-specific st...
<p>Calculation based on fix effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) a...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary mean difference was calculated using a random-effects model. The mean difference and 95%...
The summary odds ratio was calculated using a fixed-effects model. The odds ratio and 95% CI for eac...
The summary odds ratio was calculated using a random-effects model. The odds ratio and 95% CI for ea...
<p>Calculation based on random effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD...
<p>A: Total subjects from the Subgroup1 B: Males from the Subgroup 1 C: Females from the Subgroup 1 ...
<p>A. <i>RBMS1</i>-<i>TANK</i> locus and B. <i>TSPYL5</i> locus. The overall inverse—variance-weight...
Results of subgroup analyses of the association between mean difference in BMI and NEAP according to...
<p>BMI calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.</p>a<p>Adjusted estima...
Significant differences between compared BMI groups according to multivariate logistic regression an...
<p>Squares indicate study-specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study-specific st...
<p>Calculation based on fix effects model. Results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) a...