Plot of the canonical discriminant functions based on the best morphometric variables selected by a forward discriminant analysis of the measurements obtained from the hooks of Diplozoon paradoxum, Paradiplozoon vaalense and Paradiplozoon ichthyoxanthon.</p
<p>93.6% of variance is accounted for by discriminant function 1 and 6.4% by function 2. Polygons ar...
<p>Linear morphometric variables used in the analysis of morphological differentiation of <i>Calotri...
<p>SGS 0061 + SGS 0090 represented by (green x); other symbol equivalencies shown in Fig. 3. Axes 1 ...
Correlations were pooled within-groups between discriminating variables and standardized canonical d...
Values are reported in micrometres (μm) followed by standard deviation and range (in parentheses). N...
<p>Linear discriminant analysis of morphometric data of the <i>Charius</i> clade members.</p
(Group Centroids: 1: P. chola; 2: P. conchonius; 3: S. sarana; 4: P. sophore 5: P. ticto).</p
<p>DF1: Discriminant function for DFA that excluded the character prosoma area due to multicolineari...
(Group Centroids: 1: P. chola; 2: P. conchonius; 3: S. sarana; 4: P. sophore 5: P. ticto).</p
<p>Discriminant functions DF1 and DF2 account for 65.7% and 32.0% of the total variance, respectivel...
Plot depicting scores on the first two discriminant functions resulting from the DFA of maxillary (u...
<p>Crosses mark the mean for each species; ellipses are 95% confidence regions. A) Results of QDFA o...
Scatterplot showing the discrimination of species groups based on the canonical discriminant functio...
<p>Filled triangles represent the western lineage and unfilled circles represent the eastern lineage...
<p>The first canonical variable explains 66.7% of sample variation and the second canonical variable...
<p>93.6% of variance is accounted for by discriminant function 1 and 6.4% by function 2. Polygons ar...
<p>Linear morphometric variables used in the analysis of morphological differentiation of <i>Calotri...
<p>SGS 0061 + SGS 0090 represented by (green x); other symbol equivalencies shown in Fig. 3. Axes 1 ...
Correlations were pooled within-groups between discriminating variables and standardized canonical d...
Values are reported in micrometres (μm) followed by standard deviation and range (in parentheses). N...
<p>Linear discriminant analysis of morphometric data of the <i>Charius</i> clade members.</p
(Group Centroids: 1: P. chola; 2: P. conchonius; 3: S. sarana; 4: P. sophore 5: P. ticto).</p
<p>DF1: Discriminant function for DFA that excluded the character prosoma area due to multicolineari...
(Group Centroids: 1: P. chola; 2: P. conchonius; 3: S. sarana; 4: P. sophore 5: P. ticto).</p
<p>Discriminant functions DF1 and DF2 account for 65.7% and 32.0% of the total variance, respectivel...
Plot depicting scores on the first two discriminant functions resulting from the DFA of maxillary (u...
<p>Crosses mark the mean for each species; ellipses are 95% confidence regions. A) Results of QDFA o...
Scatterplot showing the discrimination of species groups based on the canonical discriminant functio...
<p>Filled triangles represent the western lineage and unfilled circles represent the eastern lineage...
<p>The first canonical variable explains 66.7% of sample variation and the second canonical variable...
<p>93.6% of variance is accounted for by discriminant function 1 and 6.4% by function 2. Polygons ar...
<p>Linear morphometric variables used in the analysis of morphological differentiation of <i>Calotri...
<p>SGS 0061 + SGS 0090 represented by (green x); other symbol equivalencies shown in Fig. 3. Axes 1 ...