The proportion of points with a 4-dB or greater decline in the groups in which the distances to the abnormal FAF differed (P = 0.113, Fisher’s exact test).</p
<p>Proportion of height and weight percentile drop >10% from baseline by group.</p
<p>Comparison of the acoustic ratios measured for the 3 different pathogens and the negative control...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
Confidence intervals per test for each subgroup and the effect sizes of the difference between the s...
<p>Absolute value of the correlation differences for each of the four fMRI studies plotted against E...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>The number (and percentage) of participants in each demographic category, and Fisher’s exact test...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
Comparison between groups (non-fallers and fallers) for the area of center of pressure (A-COP) varia...
<p>The resistance was measured by the proportion method.</p><p>*Where cells had values 5 or less the...
Shown are the test ranges for posteriors with a uniform prior when pFN = 0.25, pFP = 0.05, and posit...
The proportions of each radiological sign that disappeared in different follow-up interval groups.</...
<p>Ratio of the distance from the participants who did not experience collision (no exp group) to th...
<p>Proportion of height and weight percentile drop >10% from baseline by group.</p
<p>Comparison of the acoustic ratios measured for the 3 different pathogens and the negative control...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
Confidence intervals per test for each subgroup and the effect sizes of the difference between the s...
<p>Absolute value of the correlation differences for each of the four fMRI studies plotted against E...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
<p>The number (and percentage) of participants in each demographic category, and Fisher’s exact test...
<p>Includes proportion of Hits (responding <i>different</i> on change trials) and False Alarms (resp...
Comparison between groups (non-fallers and fallers) for the area of center of pressure (A-COP) varia...
<p>The resistance was measured by the proportion method.</p><p>*Where cells had values 5 or less the...
Shown are the test ranges for posteriors with a uniform prior when pFN = 0.25, pFP = 0.05, and posit...
The proportions of each radiological sign that disappeared in different follow-up interval groups.</...
<p>Ratio of the distance from the participants who did not experience collision (no exp group) to th...
<p>Proportion of height and weight percentile drop >10% from baseline by group.</p
<p>Comparison of the acoustic ratios measured for the 3 different pathogens and the negative control...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p