Table S7. Annotation of differentially expressed genes in the comparison of âHL vs FXâ. FX: the population occurring in Fengxiang; HL: the population occurring in the Helan Mountains (XLS 895 kb
Abstract Background Although the importance of host plant chemistry in plant–insect interactions is ...
Figure S2. Phylogram reconstructed based (COI + COII + Cytb + A6A8 + EF-1α + ITS1) genes. Bayesian p...
Figure S3. Pairwise mismatch distribution of HL population. X axis: Pairwise Differences. Y axis: Fr...
Table S5. Annotation of differentially expressed genes in the comparison of âHC vs FXâ. FX: the ...
Table S6. Annotation of differentially expressed genes in the comparison of âHL vs HCâ. HC: the ...
Figure S5. GO enrichment of differentially expressed genes in (a) ‘HL vs HC’ and (b) ‘HL vs FX’. The...
Figure S4. Cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes. Different colors indicate different l...
Table S1–S3, Table S11 and Table S12. Table S1. Number of paired reads obtained by RNA-Seq. Table S2...
Table S9. Candidate DEGs related to detoxification and oxidation-reduction (XLS 71 kb
Figure S1. Gene ontology classification of assembled unigenes. The 59,179 matched unigenes were clas...
Figure S2. KOG functional classification of all unigenes. A total of 28,896 unigenes showed signific...
Table S10. Candidate DEGs related to stress response, water-deprivation response and putative osmore...
Table S4. Primers designed for detecting simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in genes of Subpsaltria yang...
Figure S3. KEGG pathway distributions of midgut unigenes. The genes according to KEGG metabolic path...
Table S1. Primer names, sequences used in PCR reactions of genes sequenced. Table S2. List of groupi...
Abstract Background Although the importance of host plant chemistry in plant–insect interactions is ...
Figure S2. Phylogram reconstructed based (COI + COII + Cytb + A6A8 + EF-1α + ITS1) genes. Bayesian p...
Figure S3. Pairwise mismatch distribution of HL population. X axis: Pairwise Differences. Y axis: Fr...
Table S5. Annotation of differentially expressed genes in the comparison of âHC vs FXâ. FX: the ...
Table S6. Annotation of differentially expressed genes in the comparison of âHL vs HCâ. HC: the ...
Figure S5. GO enrichment of differentially expressed genes in (a) ‘HL vs HC’ and (b) ‘HL vs FX’. The...
Figure S4. Cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes. Different colors indicate different l...
Table S1–S3, Table S11 and Table S12. Table S1. Number of paired reads obtained by RNA-Seq. Table S2...
Table S9. Candidate DEGs related to detoxification and oxidation-reduction (XLS 71 kb
Figure S1. Gene ontology classification of assembled unigenes. The 59,179 matched unigenes were clas...
Figure S2. KOG functional classification of all unigenes. A total of 28,896 unigenes showed signific...
Table S10. Candidate DEGs related to stress response, water-deprivation response and putative osmore...
Table S4. Primers designed for detecting simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in genes of Subpsaltria yang...
Figure S3. KEGG pathway distributions of midgut unigenes. The genes according to KEGG metabolic path...
Table S1. Primer names, sequences used in PCR reactions of genes sequenced. Table S2. List of groupi...
Abstract Background Although the importance of host plant chemistry in plant–insect interactions is ...
Figure S2. Phylogram reconstructed based (COI + COII + Cytb + A6A8 + EF-1α + ITS1) genes. Bayesian p...
Figure S3. Pairwise mismatch distribution of HL population. X axis: Pairwise Differences. Y axis: Fr...
DOI
Add to ORKG