The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dotted blue lines respectively for the each method. The mean value of the NC computed with the parameters used for generating the data are displayed in red (true NC) with the [5 95] confidence intervals denoted by the shaded region.</p
<p>A–C) Means of the 50 estimations versus AR(1) coefficient at three levels of SD of AR(1) noise. D...
Predictions (averaged across all individual fits) from the noisy, inefficient observer model (see Me...
<p>Average normalized relative decision weights, as a function of segment number, condition, and noi...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The left panel shows the noise ceiling for the correlation coefficient while the right panel shows t...
Both methods produced identical results thus the curves are perfectly superimposed. The correspondin...
Histograms of the noise ceiling obtained with the split half method (blue) and the analytical NC (wi...
<p>The x-axis depicts the respective tone positions. The y-axis denotes the mean N1m source strength...
<p>Average normalized relative decision weights for the spectro-temporal condition, as a function of...
Allocation of the 100 generated connectivity matrices varied from 5:95 to 95:5, increasing in increm...
At each noise allocation, 100 iterations were conducted. The red dashed line is at the nominal p-val...
Given a white Gaussian noise signal on a sampling grid, its variance can be estimated from a small b...
<p>CI represents confidence interval.</p><p>The average metric values of different algorithms (Mean ...
<p>A–C) Means of the 50 estimations versus AR(1) coefficient at three levels of SD of AR(1) noise. D...
Predictions (averaged across all individual fits) from the noisy, inefficient observer model (see Me...
<p>Average normalized relative decision weights, as a function of segment number, condition, and noi...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The mean value and the [5 95] percentiles are displayed in continuous and dashed blue lines respecti...
The left panel shows the noise ceiling for the correlation coefficient while the right panel shows t...
Both methods produced identical results thus the curves are perfectly superimposed. The correspondin...
Histograms of the noise ceiling obtained with the split half method (blue) and the analytical NC (wi...
<p>The x-axis depicts the respective tone positions. The y-axis denotes the mean N1m source strength...
<p>Average normalized relative decision weights for the spectro-temporal condition, as a function of...
Allocation of the 100 generated connectivity matrices varied from 5:95 to 95:5, increasing in increm...
At each noise allocation, 100 iterations were conducted. The red dashed line is at the nominal p-val...
Given a white Gaussian noise signal on a sampling grid, its variance can be estimated from a small b...
<p>CI represents confidence interval.</p><p>The average metric values of different algorithms (Mean ...
<p>A–C) Means of the 50 estimations versus AR(1) coefficient at three levels of SD of AR(1) noise. D...
Predictions (averaged across all individual fits) from the noisy, inefficient observer model (see Me...
<p>Average normalized relative decision weights, as a function of segment number, condition, and noi...