(a) Models operating in deterministic (DET) mode for three different downsampling rules. Left panels: Observer-observer (horizontal axis) and observer-model (vertical axis) proportion agreement on the double-pass set. Error bars denote 95% binomial proportion confidence intervals. Right panels: Difference between observer-observer and observer-model proportion agreement for each of 5 observers. Error bars denote 95% binomial proportion difference confidence intervals. (b) Same as (a), but for model with AVG downsampling operating in stochastic mode (AVG-STO).</p
This paper introduces a test for the comparison of multiple misspecifed conditional interval models,...
For inter-observer reliability, the FreBAQ-G difference scores for assessor 1 and 2 are plotted agai...
Within the pharmaceutical industry it is common practice to transfer analytical methods from one lab...
(a) Plots of model vs. observer performance (proportion correct), averaged across observers (left su...
Blue lines denote human observer performance on the test set (stimuli not used for model estimation)...
<p><b>Panel A:</b> Each reference stimulus recording is associated with the rms of its deterministic...
<p>Blue bars denote subjects with below-median values for β<sub>gain</sub>–β<sub>loss</sub>; red bar...
<p>Left Panel: Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between ref...
<p>In each panel the solid red line is a section of the lowest red line in <a href="http://www.plosc...
<p>Panel a) displays the proportion correct and Panel b) the reaction time results for the transsacc...
Consider the problem of comparing variances of k populations with the variance of a control populati...
<p>Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Panel C and D: Mean MT and AUC for the congruent a...
<p><b>AB</b> Subjects are assumed to use each model with some probability. The coloured regions repr...
(a) Uncertainty estimates for bootstrapped confidence intervals, as a function of the number of subj...
(a) Second-stage filter weights learned by the model for representative observer AMA in Experiment 1...
This paper introduces a test for the comparison of multiple misspecifed conditional interval models,...
For inter-observer reliability, the FreBAQ-G difference scores for assessor 1 and 2 are plotted agai...
Within the pharmaceutical industry it is common practice to transfer analytical methods from one lab...
(a) Plots of model vs. observer performance (proportion correct), averaged across observers (left su...
Blue lines denote human observer performance on the test set (stimuli not used for model estimation)...
<p><b>Panel A:</b> Each reference stimulus recording is associated with the rms of its deterministic...
<p>Blue bars denote subjects with below-median values for β<sub>gain</sub>–β<sub>loss</sub>; red bar...
<p>Left Panel: Proportion correct averaged across individuals for each degree difference between ref...
<p>In each panel the solid red line is a section of the lowest red line in <a href="http://www.plosc...
<p>Panel a) displays the proportion correct and Panel b) the reaction time results for the transsacc...
Consider the problem of comparing variances of k populations with the variance of a control populati...
<p>Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Panel C and D: Mean MT and AUC for the congruent a...
<p><b>AB</b> Subjects are assumed to use each model with some probability. The coloured regions repr...
(a) Uncertainty estimates for bootstrapped confidence intervals, as a function of the number of subj...
(a) Second-stage filter weights learned by the model for representative observer AMA in Experiment 1...
This paper introduces a test for the comparison of multiple misspecifed conditional interval models,...
For inter-observer reliability, the FreBAQ-G difference scores for assessor 1 and 2 are plotted agai...
Within the pharmaceutical industry it is common practice to transfer analytical methods from one lab...