These results were averaged from four target categories except the sport category due to the special categorization of scale levels for this category. Two standard computational models SALIENCY and GIST that are believed to account for information conveyed during the first feedforward sweep could not reach human performance. Faster R-CNN built on backbone with FPN and ResNet-50, showed competitive recognition accuracy to human performance.</p
The implementation of computational systems to perform intensive operations often involves balancing...
The predictions of 13 computational bottom-up saliency models and a newly introduced Multiscale Cont...
[The top-left sub-figure] RT distributions for correct (thick line) and incorrect (thin line) respon...
Results at four levels of ISI values were showed for human observers. Three standard computational m...
Again, two scales are analyzed here: “L”- the largest level, “S”—the smallest level. SALIENCY model ...
Five images with the least recognition rate by human observers are displayed, respectively. The targ...
<p>(A) Accuracy rates. <b>i-vi</b> - When compared against the average decisions of their peers in a...
Performance comparison of CNN models with different region sizes and other baseline models.</p
Accuracy comparisons of ten experiments with SVM, KNN, BPNN, CNN, ResNet, FA+ResNet models.</p
(a) Time-varying representational similarity analysis between human MEG data and the computational m...
Fine-tuning of a model is a method that is most often required to cater the users’ explicit requirem...
<p>(A, B), The performance achieved across different number of training images. (C), The performance...
We have implemented two machine-learning models of object recognition by human observers. Both model...
<p>The left three models directly classify from text, the right two models are concept-extraction ba...
<p> Colored dots correspond to the performance of the 4 computational models tested, black dots to t...
The implementation of computational systems to perform intensive operations often involves balancing...
The predictions of 13 computational bottom-up saliency models and a newly introduced Multiscale Cont...
[The top-left sub-figure] RT distributions for correct (thick line) and incorrect (thin line) respon...
Results at four levels of ISI values were showed for human observers. Three standard computational m...
Again, two scales are analyzed here: “L”- the largest level, “S”—the smallest level. SALIENCY model ...
Five images with the least recognition rate by human observers are displayed, respectively. The targ...
<p>(A) Accuracy rates. <b>i-vi</b> - When compared against the average decisions of their peers in a...
Performance comparison of CNN models with different region sizes and other baseline models.</p
Accuracy comparisons of ten experiments with SVM, KNN, BPNN, CNN, ResNet, FA+ResNet models.</p
(a) Time-varying representational similarity analysis between human MEG data and the computational m...
Fine-tuning of a model is a method that is most often required to cater the users’ explicit requirem...
<p>(A, B), The performance achieved across different number of training images. (C), The performance...
We have implemented two machine-learning models of object recognition by human observers. Both model...
<p>The left three models directly classify from text, the right two models are concept-extraction ba...
<p> Colored dots correspond to the performance of the 4 computational models tested, black dots to t...
The implementation of computational systems to perform intensive operations often involves balancing...
The predictions of 13 computational bottom-up saliency models and a newly introduced Multiscale Cont...
[The top-left sub-figure] RT distributions for correct (thick line) and incorrect (thin line) respon...