Comparison or turnaround time (min) and number of manual steps for extraction methods for developers (A-F) for each specimen type (sputum, blood, and stool). The area surrounded by the dashed line indicates where the more optimal technologies are in terms of processing time and the number of user steps. Note, to prevent obfuscation with clusters of multiple symbols located on a single point, in such instances each symbol is slightly diffused (where applicable) to provide clarity to the reader.</p
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
We compared bacillary loads after splitting sputum specimens by chemical (N-acetyl-L-cysteine [NALC]...
Infectious disease nucleic acid amplification technologies (NAAT) have superior sensitivity, specifi...
The comparison of each technology (developer A–F) via radar plots using ASSUR. The ASSUR criteria, a...
a<p>Time required to obtain extracted DNA, including hands-on time and incubation periods.</p
<p>The diagram illustrates the workflow used for the mouth and skin samples (the fecal samples were ...
Hands-on times for the molecular techniques surveyed. An average sample workload is considered. In b...
<p>A) A plot of identified analytes as a function of extraction time. Nonlinear regression fitting t...
Estimated sample size, sampling technique, screening tools, eligibility for sputum collection and me...
a<p>The time for centrifugation/vortexing, incubation steps and hands-on time was determined.</p>b<p...
Summary of the diagnostic performance of different assays using filter paper sampling technique comp...
<p>Optimized, automated TruTip extraction protocol for liquefied, raw sputum.</p
<p>Comparison of the previous protocol (top) and biosafe sputum processing protocol (bottom).</p
peer reviewedBACKGROUND: This is the third in a series of publications presenting formal method vali...
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
We compared bacillary loads after splitting sputum specimens by chemical (N-acetyl-L-cysteine [NALC]...
Infectious disease nucleic acid amplification technologies (NAAT) have superior sensitivity, specifi...
The comparison of each technology (developer A–F) via radar plots using ASSUR. The ASSUR criteria, a...
a<p>Time required to obtain extracted DNA, including hands-on time and incubation periods.</p
<p>The diagram illustrates the workflow used for the mouth and skin samples (the fecal samples were ...
Hands-on times for the molecular techniques surveyed. An average sample workload is considered. In b...
<p>A) A plot of identified analytes as a function of extraction time. Nonlinear regression fitting t...
Estimated sample size, sampling technique, screening tools, eligibility for sputum collection and me...
a<p>The time for centrifugation/vortexing, incubation steps and hands-on time was determined.</p>b<p...
Summary of the diagnostic performance of different assays using filter paper sampling technique comp...
<p>Optimized, automated TruTip extraction protocol for liquefied, raw sputum.</p
<p>Comparison of the previous protocol (top) and biosafe sputum processing protocol (bottom).</p
peer reviewedBACKGROUND: This is the third in a series of publications presenting formal method vali...
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
The swabbing and tape-stripping methods have traditionally been used for collecting skin microbiome ...
We compared bacillary loads after splitting sputum specimens by chemical (N-acetyl-L-cysteine [NALC]...