Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits - Fig 1
- Agata Klimkowska (6631481)
- Klara Goldstein (6631484)
- Tomasz Wyszomirski (3555)
- Łukasz Kozub (6631487)
- Mateusz Wilk (6631490)
- Camiel Aggenbach (6631493)
- Jan P. Bakker (3716353)
- Heinrich Belting (6631496)
- Boudewijn Beltman (4514194)
- Volker Blüml (6631499)
- Yzaak De Vries (6631502)
- Beate Geiger-Udod (6631505)
- Ab P. Grootjans (6631508)
- Petter Hedberg (6631511)
- Henk J. Jager (6631514)
- Dick Kerkhof (6631517)
- Johannes Kollmann (3256605)
- Paweł Pawlikowski (3878797)
- Elisabeth Pleyl (6631520)
- Warner Reinink (6631523)
- Hakan Rydin (2912015)
- Joachim Schrautzer (6631526)
- Jan Sliva (6631529)
- Robert Stańko (6631532)
- Sebastian Sundberg (147427)
- Tiemo Timmermann (6631535)
- Lesław Wołejko (6631538)
- Rob F. van der Burg (6631541)
- Dick van der Hoek (6631544)
- Jose M. H. van Diggelen (6631547)
- Adrie van Heerden (6631550)
- Loekie van Tweel (6631553)
- Kees Vegelin (6631556)
- Wiktor Kotowski (6631559)
Publication date
April 2019
DOI Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)Abstract
Geographic distribution of the sites (left) and DCA graphs of sites (centre of centroids) (right). Ordination with 5476 plots, 837 species. Eigenvalues for first and second ordination axis: 0.88, 0.65 (gradient length 9.0, 7.2 SD units, respectively). Explained variation (cumulative): 2% and 3.4%. A relatively low explained variation was possibly due to large number of species. For site symbols see S1 Table. ‘M’ indicates ‘MIRE’- the set of reference data and partly overlaps with other community data. When site identity was included as supplementary variable it accounted for 22.2% variation in data (adjusted).</p
Add to ORKG