Percent improvement in RMSE, time delay, and SNR for each participant on the entire 90 seconds tracking signal and the subsections of the first, middle, and last 30 seconds.</p
<p>Performance time in three trials and improvements with respect to trials with a leading cue.</p
Correct trials used more time steps than incorrect trials. This effect is only visible when noise is...
<p>Frequency per minute and percent time for behavioural elements displayed in Experiment 1.</p
Distribution of improvement percentage in RMSE, time delay, and SNR over 90 seconds of the visuomoto...
1<p>After an initial disturbance (30%) to connection weights.</p>2<p>With continuous noise (10%) add...
<p>Improvement (in percentage), i.e., inverse of error decrease, of Retention compared to Pre-test u...
<p>Experimental Results for End-Effector Tracking: RMS Control Effort for the Control Algorithms.</p
<p>With the time increment increasing, the time courses of the measure become smoother, resulting in...
<p><b>Note:</b> The average mean delay corresponding to a 20% increase in the particular parameter i...
<p>A) accuracy, B) onset delay, and C) offset delay. We ordered all 48 channels by decreasing CNR, a...
Comparison of the RMSSD values that were calculated from a 1-min segment after various stabilization...
<p>The relative improvement in performance time was significantly different between groups and it wa...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for different coherence ranges, fro...
<p>The label, ‘av’, denotes ‘average’, and the first row and last column show the average performanc...
<p><sup>a</sup> represents significant difference at P<0.001 level from Control at the same time poi...
<p>Performance time in three trials and improvements with respect to trials with a leading cue.</p
Correct trials used more time steps than incorrect trials. This effect is only visible when noise is...
<p>Frequency per minute and percent time for behavioural elements displayed in Experiment 1.</p
Distribution of improvement percentage in RMSE, time delay, and SNR over 90 seconds of the visuomoto...
1<p>After an initial disturbance (30%) to connection weights.</p>2<p>With continuous noise (10%) add...
<p>Improvement (in percentage), i.e., inverse of error decrease, of Retention compared to Pre-test u...
<p>Experimental Results for End-Effector Tracking: RMS Control Effort for the Control Algorithms.</p
<p>With the time increment increasing, the time courses of the measure become smoother, resulting in...
<p><b>Note:</b> The average mean delay corresponding to a 20% increase in the particular parameter i...
<p>A) accuracy, B) onset delay, and C) offset delay. We ordered all 48 channels by decreasing CNR, a...
Comparison of the RMSSD values that were calculated from a 1-min segment after various stabilization...
<p>The relative improvement in performance time was significantly different between groups and it wa...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for different coherence ranges, fro...
<p>The label, ‘av’, denotes ‘average’, and the first row and last column show the average performanc...
<p><sup>a</sup> represents significant difference at P<0.001 level from Control at the same time poi...
<p>Performance time in three trials and improvements with respect to trials with a leading cue.</p
Correct trials used more time steps than incorrect trials. This effect is only visible when noise is...
<p>Frequency per minute and percent time for behavioural elements displayed in Experiment 1.</p