Figure S8. Mass normalized metabolic power during each participantâs Assisted and Unassisted data collection sessions. The normalized metabolic power is plotted for participants one (A), two (B), three (C), four (D), five (E), and six (F). Fit lines were generated based on a second order polynomial. (PNG 654 kb
Table S2. Activities asked in the questionnaire and the number of patients who indicated for each ac...
Figure S2. Trunk activation patterns normalized to breathing cycle compared to gait cycle. Compariso...
BackgroundAnkle exoskeletons offer a promising opportunity to offset mechanical deficits after strok...
Figure S4. Ankle, knee and hip joint powers are shown for the non-paretic and paretic limbs with and...
Figure S2. Ankle, knee and hip joint velocities are shown for the non-paretic and paretic limbs with...
Figure S7. Average net non-paretic knee power was significantly reduced at three walking speeds (n00...
Figure S6. Average negative paretic joint powers showed limited changes with exoskeleton assistance ...
Figure S5. Average positive joint powers presented as percentages of total joint contributions demon...
Complete overview of descriptive data and statistical results. The additional file contains a comple...
Level data for all visits. Level at pre-training (pre) and post-training (post) gait analyses (GAs) ...
Figure S1. AMAP scores for all healthy individuals at all four walking speeds are provided. Figure S...
Figures of the kinetic and kinematic gait pattern pre-post gait training. Figures showing the ground...
Figure S1. Trunk activation patterns in all SCI subjects. Activation patterns recorded from the rect...
Results of the 10-m walk test (10MWT) and Timed up and go Test (TUG). Groupwise results of the 10MWT...
Table A2. Root mean square electromyography data for all recorded muscles. (PDF 56kb
Table S2. Activities asked in the questionnaire and the number of patients who indicated for each ac...
Figure S2. Trunk activation patterns normalized to breathing cycle compared to gait cycle. Compariso...
BackgroundAnkle exoskeletons offer a promising opportunity to offset mechanical deficits after strok...
Figure S4. Ankle, knee and hip joint powers are shown for the non-paretic and paretic limbs with and...
Figure S2. Ankle, knee and hip joint velocities are shown for the non-paretic and paretic limbs with...
Figure S7. Average net non-paretic knee power was significantly reduced at three walking speeds (n00...
Figure S6. Average negative paretic joint powers showed limited changes with exoskeleton assistance ...
Figure S5. Average positive joint powers presented as percentages of total joint contributions demon...
Complete overview of descriptive data and statistical results. The additional file contains a comple...
Level data for all visits. Level at pre-training (pre) and post-training (post) gait analyses (GAs) ...
Figure S1. AMAP scores for all healthy individuals at all four walking speeds are provided. Figure S...
Figures of the kinetic and kinematic gait pattern pre-post gait training. Figures showing the ground...
Figure S1. Trunk activation patterns in all SCI subjects. Activation patterns recorded from the rect...
Results of the 10-m walk test (10MWT) and Timed up and go Test (TUG). Groupwise results of the 10MWT...
Table A2. Root mean square electromyography data for all recorded muscles. (PDF 56kb
Table S2. Activities asked in the questionnaire and the number of patients who indicated for each ac...
Figure S2. Trunk activation patterns normalized to breathing cycle compared to gait cycle. Compariso...
BackgroundAnkle exoskeletons offer a promising opportunity to offset mechanical deficits after strok...