Table S1. Classification of main disabling condition of recipient of care from the 2015 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers. Table S2. Relationships between pairs of independent and dependent variables for multivariate logistic regression analyses, by carer sex. Table S3. Characteristics of co-resident carers aged 15–64 years, by main condition of the adult being cared for. Table S4. Impact of caring on employment for co-resident primary carers aged 15–64 years, by main condition of the adult being cared for. Table S5. Supplementary logistic regression analyses of association between recipient types of formal assistance, unmet need for assistance, other carer characteristics and not being employed for co-resident carers aged 15–64 years...
Table S1. Characteristics of patients who did and did not participate in the study. Table S2. Univar...
Tables S1, S2_1, S2_2, S2_3 and S2_4. Table S1 shows effect on location on use of psychotropic drugs...
Baseline characteristics of the sample based on age group. Table S2. Cognitive decline 4 years later...
(Disablement Process Model definitions and examples); Table S2. (Items and Possible Responses in the...
Table S1. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of trajectory groups of work disability among...
Table S2. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of trajectory groups of unemployment among th...
Table S1. Binary logistic regression analysis of determinants of self-rated health in 134 Alzheimer ...
Figure S1. Trajectory groups of labour market marginalisation (LMM), i.e. combined work disability a...
Background information included studies. a The TOPICS-MDS research group provided the following defi...
Results of Sensitivity Analyses. The table presents the results of sensitivity analyses that exclude...
Data concerning differences in proportions with at least one visit registration with respect to four...
Table S2. Caregiver binary logistic regression model. Full binary logistic regression model data. (D...
Table S1.1. Mean and standard deviation for WHOQOL-BREF by carer age, sex, dementia subtypes and typ...
Mediation effects of health-related behavior variables (Model 3) and social support variables (Model...
Table S2. Results of the coping strategies questionnaire (SVF) for family caregivers with patients i...
Table S1. Characteristics of patients who did and did not participate in the study. Table S2. Univar...
Tables S1, S2_1, S2_2, S2_3 and S2_4. Table S1 shows effect on location on use of psychotropic drugs...
Baseline characteristics of the sample based on age group. Table S2. Cognitive decline 4 years later...
(Disablement Process Model definitions and examples); Table S2. (Items and Possible Responses in the...
Table S1. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of trajectory groups of work disability among...
Table S2. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics of trajectory groups of unemployment among th...
Table S1. Binary logistic regression analysis of determinants of self-rated health in 134 Alzheimer ...
Figure S1. Trajectory groups of labour market marginalisation (LMM), i.e. combined work disability a...
Background information included studies. a The TOPICS-MDS research group provided the following defi...
Results of Sensitivity Analyses. The table presents the results of sensitivity analyses that exclude...
Data concerning differences in proportions with at least one visit registration with respect to four...
Table S2. Caregiver binary logistic regression model. Full binary logistic regression model data. (D...
Table S1.1. Mean and standard deviation for WHOQOL-BREF by carer age, sex, dementia subtypes and typ...
Mediation effects of health-related behavior variables (Model 3) and social support variables (Model...
Table S2. Results of the coping strategies questionnaire (SVF) for family caregivers with patients i...
Table S1. Characteristics of patients who did and did not participate in the study. Table S2. Univar...
Tables S1, S2_1, S2_2, S2_3 and S2_4. Table S1 shows effect on location on use of psychotropic drugs...
Baseline characteristics of the sample based on age group. Table S2. Cognitive decline 4 years later...