CESIR simulation: Selection rates (%) for the 45 irrelevant variables, grouped together by prevalence (9 variables per interval).</p
<p>Numbers of variants selected are averaged across the three genes and across the simulations for A...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>The number of times each parameter value is used in the retained simulations is compared between ...
<p>Model selection by number of available studies (and % of random-effects meta-analyses)*.</p
Each plot shows the bias for 1 relevant variable (rel.) and the 9 irrelevant variables (irr.) within...
<p>Rejection proportions from 100,000 repetitions of each simulation scenario: 60 variables (15 Bern...
<p>Rejection proportions from 100,000 repetitions of each simulation scenario: 17 variables (4 Berno...
<p>Total combined variation from all 11 different evolutionary isolation metrics that is captured wh...
<p>Left: 5% initially infected, chosen randomly from the population. Right: 5% initially infected, c...
Parameters for simulations of antibody distributions in vaccinated and control populations for three...
<p>100 simulations were used to plot and evaluate the predictive performance of six variable selecti...
For the simulated population, bias index of the Hansen & Hurwitz estimator as a function of the nonr...
<p>Sub-populations with different ranges of risk simulating a shift in the mean peak VO<sub>2</sub> ...
<p>Percentage rates for selected mental states and alternatives (the second most commonly chosen wor...
<p>Bar heights are the mean allele counts averaged over 10 simulations, and error bars denote one st...
<p>Numbers of variants selected are averaged across the three genes and across the simulations for A...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>The number of times each parameter value is used in the retained simulations is compared between ...
<p>Model selection by number of available studies (and % of random-effects meta-analyses)*.</p
Each plot shows the bias for 1 relevant variable (rel.) and the 9 irrelevant variables (irr.) within...
<p>Rejection proportions from 100,000 repetitions of each simulation scenario: 60 variables (15 Bern...
<p>Rejection proportions from 100,000 repetitions of each simulation scenario: 17 variables (4 Berno...
<p>Total combined variation from all 11 different evolutionary isolation metrics that is captured wh...
<p>Left: 5% initially infected, chosen randomly from the population. Right: 5% initially infected, c...
Parameters for simulations of antibody distributions in vaccinated and control populations for three...
<p>100 simulations were used to plot and evaluate the predictive performance of six variable selecti...
For the simulated population, bias index of the Hansen & Hurwitz estimator as a function of the nonr...
<p>Sub-populations with different ranges of risk simulating a shift in the mean peak VO<sub>2</sub> ...
<p>Percentage rates for selected mental states and alternatives (the second most commonly chosen wor...
<p>Bar heights are the mean allele counts averaged over 10 simulations, and error bars denote one st...
<p>Numbers of variants selected are averaged across the three genes and across the simulations for A...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>The number of times each parameter value is used in the retained simulations is compared between ...
DOI
Add to ORKG