(A) Contemporary Alosine Biomass model. (B) Restored Alosine Biomass model. The color gradient and size of nodes are representing the predator overlap index number. Numbers refer to the functional groups, anadromous alosine are represented by underlined numbers.</p
<p>Correspondence analysis on percent cover of major benthic functional groups, abundance of sea urc...
<p>Abundance of herbivorous fish species surveyed using underwater visual censuses at each region (n...
<p>a) Keystone (KS ≥0; black circles) and dominant groups (KD ≥0.7; grey circles), respectively, in ...
The functional group lists are ranked and ordered in terms of keystoneness, and circle size reflects...
Simulated vs. observed relative contributions to the process of piscivory on reefs, based on predato...
Pianka’s index of niche overlap comparing diets of mountain whitefish and rainbow trout in Sheep Cre...
<p>Proportions of herring, other forage fish (except eulachon) and euphausiids in selected predator ...
<p>Capacities of species to utilize aquatic food types, expressed as the mean trophic profiles per s...
<p>(A) Shannon-Wiener index of niche breadth according to julian date (1 being the 1<sup>st</sup> of...
a) Spatial distribution of the total relative abundance of commercial species (sum of MaxN’s for all...
Roman numerals represent the discrete trophic levels of the functional groups in the Contemporary Al...
<p>Overlaps calculated as Pianka’s index (eq. 2); values larger than 0.70 shown in bold.</p
<p>(A) Spatial variation in the reef fish functional group abundances on reefs at the transect level...
Abundance of the major genera based on green forage fed groups and fattening times.</p
<p>Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) analysis showing the relationship between 8 sites at t...
<p>Correspondence analysis on percent cover of major benthic functional groups, abundance of sea urc...
<p>Abundance of herbivorous fish species surveyed using underwater visual censuses at each region (n...
<p>a) Keystone (KS ≥0; black circles) and dominant groups (KD ≥0.7; grey circles), respectively, in ...
The functional group lists are ranked and ordered in terms of keystoneness, and circle size reflects...
Simulated vs. observed relative contributions to the process of piscivory on reefs, based on predato...
Pianka’s index of niche overlap comparing diets of mountain whitefish and rainbow trout in Sheep Cre...
<p>Proportions of herring, other forage fish (except eulachon) and euphausiids in selected predator ...
<p>Capacities of species to utilize aquatic food types, expressed as the mean trophic profiles per s...
<p>(A) Shannon-Wiener index of niche breadth according to julian date (1 being the 1<sup>st</sup> of...
a) Spatial distribution of the total relative abundance of commercial species (sum of MaxN’s for all...
Roman numerals represent the discrete trophic levels of the functional groups in the Contemporary Al...
<p>Overlaps calculated as Pianka’s index (eq. 2); values larger than 0.70 shown in bold.</p
<p>(A) Spatial variation in the reef fish functional group abundances on reefs at the transect level...
Abundance of the major genera based on green forage fed groups and fattening times.</p
<p>Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) analysis showing the relationship between 8 sites at t...
<p>Correspondence analysis on percent cover of major benthic functional groups, abundance of sea urc...
<p>Abundance of herbivorous fish species surveyed using underwater visual censuses at each region (n...
<p>a) Keystone (KS ≥0; black circles) and dominant groups (KD ≥0.7; grey circles), respectively, in ...
DOI
Add to ORKG