The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that reasons effectively in some domain of law. The paper will begin by addressing the issues of domain selection, domain analysis and knowledge acquisition, knowledge representation, and selection of an inference method. After presenting a brief argument against using rule-based reasoning as the primary mode of inference, the paper will go on to expound the virtues of Kevin Ashley\u27s HYPO, a software model of case based legal argument. It will conclude with a short description of my experience implementing part of a software model of legal reasoning
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
This paper offers a survey of the current state of AI and Law, and makes recommendations for future ...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
Legal expert systems are the nexus of Artificial Intelligence and the law. A legal expert system is ...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
This paper offers a survey of the current state of AI and Law, and makes recommendations for future ...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
Legal expert systems are the nexus of Artificial Intelligence and the law. A legal expert system is ...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
In the legal domain, it is rare to find solutions to problems by simply applying algorithms or invok...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
This paper offers a survey of the current state of AI and Law, and makes recommendations for future ...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...