This paper consists of the transcripts of a panel discussion focusing on athletic directors’, chancellors’, and presidents’ experiences with academic reform. The panel participants discuss a number of topics, including recent and past academic reform efforts, the process of implementing those initiatives, and the effects of those policies on student athletes and intercollegiate sport
This dissertation examined how the executive leadership model influenced the leadership and governan...
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of faculty senators regarding intercollegiate...
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89317/1/2001_Knight_Commission_talk3.pd
This paper consists of the transcripts of a panel discussion focusing on athletic directors’, chance...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Michael Oriard’s keynote address. Similar to O...
Recent reform initiatives have offered ideas for improving academic and financial oversight, but the...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Harrison’s (2012) work. The author suggests th...
The purpose of this article is to offer a sociohistorical overview of academic reform in the Nationa...
This chapter describes the perspectives of faculty regarding decision making and oversight of interc...
The purpose of this article is to provide an historical overview of the National Collegiate Athletic...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Harrison’s (2012) work. The author highlights ...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Michael Oriard’s keynote address. The paper hi...
The Knight Commissionhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89316/1/2000_Knight_Commission_...
This dissertation examined how the executive leadership model influenced the leadership and governan...
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of faculty senators regarding intercollegiate...
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89317/1/2001_Knight_Commission_talk3.pd
This paper consists of the transcripts of a panel discussion focusing on athletic directors’, chance...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Michael Oriard’s keynote address. Similar to O...
Recent reform initiatives have offered ideas for improving academic and financial oversight, but the...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Harrison’s (2012) work. The author suggests th...
The purpose of this article is to offer a sociohistorical overview of academic reform in the Nationa...
This chapter describes the perspectives of faculty regarding decision making and oversight of interc...
The purpose of this article is to provide an historical overview of the National Collegiate Athletic...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Harrison’s (2012) work. The author highlights ...
The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Michael Oriard’s keynote address. The paper hi...
The Knight Commissionhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89316/1/2000_Knight_Commission_...
This dissertation examined how the executive leadership model influenced the leadership and governan...
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of faculty senators regarding intercollegiate...
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89317/1/2001_Knight_Commission_talk3.pd