Assessing the impact of a new health sector pay system upon NHS staff in England

Background: Pay and pay systems are a critical element in any health sector human resource strategy. Changing a pay system can be one strategy to achieve or sustain organizational change. This paper reports on the design and implementation of a completely new pay system in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. 'Agenda for Change' constituted the largest-ever attempt to introduce a new pay system in the UK public services, covering more than one million staff. Its objectives were to improve the delivery of patient care as well as enhance staff recruitment, retention and motivation, and to facilitate new ways of working. Methods: This study was the first independent assessment of the impact of Agenda for Change at a local and national level. The methods used in the research were a literature review; review of 'grey' unpublished documentation provided by key stakeholders in the process; analysis of available data; interviews with key national informants (representing government, employers and trade unions), and case studies conducted with senior human resource managers in ten NHS hospitals in England Results: Most of the NHS trust managers interviewed were in favour of Agenda for Change, believing it would assist in delivering improvements in patient care and staff experience. The main benefits highlighted were: 'fairness', moving different staff groups on to harmonized conditions; equal pay claim 'protection'; and scope to introduce new roles and working practices. Conclusion: Agenda for Change took several years to design, and has only recently been implemented. Its very scale and central importance to NHS costs and delivery of care argues for a full assessment at an early stage so that lessons can be learned and any necessary changes made. This paper highlights weaknesses in evaluation and limitations in progress. The absence of systematically derived and applied impact indicators makes it difficult to assess impact and impact variations. Similarly, the lack of any full and systematic evaluation constrained the overall potential for Agenda for Change to deliver improvements to the NHS.sch_nur1. Buchan J, Evans D: Realising the Benefits? Implementing Agenda for Change Kings Fund, London; 2007. 2. Department of Health: The New NHS: Modern, dependable. Cm 3807 1997 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4008869]. London: Department of Health (accessed on 7 July 2007) 3. Department of Health: Agenda for Change - Modernising the NHS Pay System. Health Service Circular HSC 1999/035 1999 [http:// www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Lettersandcirculars/ Healthservicecirculars/DH_4003632]. London: Department of Health (accessed on 7 July 2007) 4. Department of Health: HR in the NHS Plan: More Staff Working Differently 2002 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publica tions/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4009112]. London: Department of Health (accessed on 8 July 2007) 5. Department of Health: A Health Service of all the Talents: Developing the NHS workforce - consultation document on the review of workforce planning [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007967]. London: Department of Health (accessed on 8 July 2007) 6. NHS Employers: The Knowledge and Skills Framework 2007 [http:// www.nhsemployers.org/pay-conditions/pay-conditions-782.cfm]. London: NHS Employers (accessed November 21 2007) 7. House of Commons Health Committee (2007): Workforce Planning: Fourth report of session 2006-07. HC 171-I (2006-07) 2007 [http:// www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhealth.htm]. London: The Stationery Office (accessed on 7 July 2007) 8. Wanless D, Appleby J, Harrison A, Patel D: Our Future Health Secured? Kings Fund London; 2007. 9. House of Commons Health Committee: NHS Deficits: First report of session 2006-07. HC 73-II 2006 [http://www.publications.parlia ment.uk/pa/cm/cmhealth.htm]. London: The Stationery Office (accessed on 7 July 2007) 10. Parish C: Public sector wages squeeze looks set to continue to 2010. Nursing Standard 2007, 21(47):6-7. 11. Incomes Data Services: Pay in the Public Services 2007 2007 [http:// www.incomesdata.co.uk/report/pps.htm]. Andover: Thomson, Sweet and Maxwell (accessed on 8 July 2007) 12. O'Dowd A: 'Poor KSF progress puts careers at risk'. Nursing Times 103(8):8-9. 20 February 2007 13. Department of Health: Agenda for Change - Review of experience in the early implementer sites 2004 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publication sandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ DH_4091585]. London: Department of Health (accessed on 6 July 2007) 14. NHS Employers: Agenda for Change and Benefits Realization: A framework for developing thinking 2005 [http://www.nhsemployers.org/payconditions/ pay-conditions-783.cfm]. London: NHS Employers (accessed on 7 July 2007) 15. Healthcare Commission: National survey of NHS staff' 2007 [http:www.healthcarecommission.org.uk/nationalfindings/surveys/ staffsur veys/2006nhsstaffsurvey.cfm]. London: Healthcare Commission (accessed on 6 July 2007) 16. Ball J, Pike J: Impact of Agenda for Change: Results from a survey of RCN members working in the NHS/GP Practices Royal College of Nursing, London; 2006. 17. National Audit Office: Pay Modernisation: A new contract for NHS consultants in England 2007 [http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/ nao_reports/06-07/0607335.pdf]. NAO, London 18. Williams S, Buchan J: Assessing the New NHS Consultant Contract: A Something for Something Deal? 2006 [http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/pub lications/kings_fund_publications/assessing_the.html]. Kings Fund, London6pub571pub