Some stuttering treatments are 'possibly effective' for some people, but more rigorous trials are required

The article discusses a study designed to determine how effective are behavioural, cognitive, and related approaches to stuttering therapy. The study was designed as a systematic review with trial-quality assessment. Included studies involved treatment of persistent developmental stuttering in any age group. Studies included had to focus on the efficacy, effectiveness, or outcomes of nonpharmacological interventions.caslChambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18. Franken, M. J., Kielstra-Van der Schalk, C. J., & Boelens, H. (2005). Experimental Treatment of early stuttering: A preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 189-199. Herder, C., Howard, C., Nye, C., & Vanryckenghem (2006). Effectiveness of behavioral stuttering treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 33, 61-73. Jones, M., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Williams, S., Ormond, T., Williams, S., Ormond, T. Schwarz, I., & Gebski, V. (2005). Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention. British Medical Journal, 331, 659-661. Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., & Triden, K. A. (1984). Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 53-58. Law, J. (2007). Behavioral stuttering treatments are effective, but no one treatment is more effective over other treatment approaches. [Abstract]. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 14-15. Abstract of Herder, C., Howard, C., Nye, C., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2006). Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 33, 61-73. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2006). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.cebm.net/index.asp1pub415pub