On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair eliminated the sales tax physical presence rule for the Dormant Commerce Clause’s “substantial nexus” requirement. This decision extends a State’s ability to tax interstate commerce. This Comment argues that Wayfair’s expansion of state tax jurisdiction should be applicable all forms of state taxation, as opposed to solely sales tax because it interprets the substantial nexus requirement of the Dormant Commerce Clause. Corporate taxation’s unitary business rule should utilize the changes to the substantial nexus requirement to restore its original intention and adapt to modern technology
Perhaps the biggest controversy in state and local taxation today concerns the constitutional author...
A comparison of South Dakota v. Wayfair with Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne indica...
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the United States Supreme Court fundamentally reshaped more than a...
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair eliminated the sales tax physical pre...
For over 50 years, U.S. Supreme Court precedents held that state sales taxes could not be constituti...
Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. Way...
For 51 years, the physical presence rule has hampered states in collecting sales and use taxes from ...
This paper takes a cross-disciplinary approach, between information systems and taxation, by focusin...
The Commerce Clause of Article I grants Congress the power to regulate commerce. In the past, an ent...
This article analyzes the implications of the Wayfair decision and considers the steps state governm...
The Supreme Court has long debated the existence and scope of its power to restrict state regulation...
This is the first of a series of essays wherein we analyze the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Sout...
More than fifty years ago, in 1967, before there was an Internet, the U.S. Supreme Court held that t...
This Comment considers how Internet sales could be taxed if Congressional action is taken to remove ...
This article reviews the Wayfair decision and its implications. First Professor Pomp considers the t...
Perhaps the biggest controversy in state and local taxation today concerns the constitutional author...
A comparison of South Dakota v. Wayfair with Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne indica...
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the United States Supreme Court fundamentally reshaped more than a...
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair eliminated the sales tax physical pre...
For over 50 years, U.S. Supreme Court precedents held that state sales taxes could not be constituti...
Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. Way...
For 51 years, the physical presence rule has hampered states in collecting sales and use taxes from ...
This paper takes a cross-disciplinary approach, between information systems and taxation, by focusin...
The Commerce Clause of Article I grants Congress the power to regulate commerce. In the past, an ent...
This article analyzes the implications of the Wayfair decision and considers the steps state governm...
The Supreme Court has long debated the existence and scope of its power to restrict state regulation...
This is the first of a series of essays wherein we analyze the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Sout...
More than fifty years ago, in 1967, before there was an Internet, the U.S. Supreme Court held that t...
This Comment considers how Internet sales could be taxed if Congressional action is taken to remove ...
This article reviews the Wayfair decision and its implications. First Professor Pomp considers the t...
Perhaps the biggest controversy in state and local taxation today concerns the constitutional author...
A comparison of South Dakota v. Wayfair with Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne indica...
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the United States Supreme Court fundamentally reshaped more than a...