Motor dual-task Timed Up & Go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single-task Timed Up & Go test

AimThe present study investigated whether dual-task Timed Up & Go tests (TUG) could identify prefrail individuals more sensitively than the single-task TUG (TUG(single)) in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults. MethodsThis cross-sectional study recruited adults aged 50years and older who actively participated in local community programs. Time taken to complete single-task TUG and dual-task TUG, carrying a cup of water (TUG(manual)) or carrying out serial-3 subtraction (TUG(cognitive)) while executing TUG, was measured. Prefrailty status was defined based on Fried's phenotypic definition. ResultsOf the 65 participants (mean age 71.58.1years), 33.3% of the 12 middle-aged (50-64years) and 62.3% of the 53 older (65years) adults were prefrail, mainly as a result of weak grip strength. The receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for differentiating prefrailty from non-frailty showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for TUG(manual) (0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.86) was better than that for TUG(single) (0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.80), whereas the AUC value was not significant for TUG(cognitive) (0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.74). The optimal cut-off points for detecting prefrailty using TUG(single), TUG(manual) and TUG(cognitive) were 7.7s (sensitivity 68%), 8.2s (sensitivity 83%), and 14.3s (sensitivity 29%), respectively. After adjusting for age, logistic regression analyses showed that individuals with TUG(manual) 8.2s or slower were 7.2-fold more likely to have prefrailty than those with TUG(manual) faster than 8.2s. ConclusionTUG(manual) is more valid and sensitive than TUG(single) in identifying prefrail individuals. The TUG(manual) thus could serve as a screening tool for early detection of individuals with prefrailty in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15: 204-210