Comparison of Subjective Visual Acuity with Visual Acuity Predicted from C-Scan Topography

PURPOSE: To compare the capability of objective measures of visual acuity (potential visual acuity from C-scan) to predict subjective visual acuity (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]). METHODS: Patients with BSCVA greater than or equal to20/20 were enrolled in four groups ( Group 1: normal [33 eyes]; Group 2: <-7.00 D myopia [43 eyes]; Group 3: greater than or equal to-7.00 D myopia [28 eyes]; Group 4: At least 1 month after LASIK [93 eyes]). Videokeratography was performed with the ray tracing Technomed C-scan. The potential visual acuity from C-scan was obtained with pupils undilated and intact precorneal tear films. All visual acuity was recorded in logMAR, and the significance of differences between acuities was assessed with a one-way ANOVA test. RESULTS: The potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing of normal and myopic eyes in response to both photopic and mesopic stimuli did not differ. In a given eye, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing was better than BSCVA, and the difference was statistically significant. Although the potential visual acuity from C-scan of postoperative LASIK eyes in response to photopic stimuli was the same, it decreased under mesopic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Potential visual acuity from C-scan overestimates subjective visual acuity due to the inadequate assumptions in ray tracing or individual retinal resolution ability. In addition, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing varies with pupil diameter in different illumination