Peran Pengadilan dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak Akibat Perceraian (Study Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Boyolali)

In building a family, of course there are many obstacles that will hinder a family trip. Not infrequently divorced because they cannot stand with each other. The thing that follows divorce is of course child custody (hadlanah), child custody is important to be resolved considering the blood flowing is the blood of both parents. the duty of law enforcers is vital if the matter of child custody becomes a dispute.This research is about the Case of Child Custody Disputes between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The Plaintiff and Defendant who are divorced want to take care of their children. Initially the children stayed with the Defendant, on the grounds that the child was not economically cared for by the Plaintiff filing a Child Custody Right Claim with the Court. The Judge's decision overturned the child whom Mummayiz had taken care of by the Defendant and sentenced the defendant to hand over the second child who had not been Mummayiz to be cared for by the defendant. Normatively the role of the court in the implementation of the decision is passive, in the case of a Civil Code decision the Court is Passive in the sense that if the parties do not return again means the decision can be executed voluntarily. In the case of custody of the child the author argues that the judge before deciding the case should ask for the opinion of the child even though it cannot be used as a witness, the child can be consulted with whom they wish to stay