The rigor versus relevance debate of management research is ongoing. We contribute to this discussion by contrasting alternative assumptions about generating management knowledge and linking knowledge generation to academic governance. Specifically, we show that knowledge-by-representation dominates the field and is reinforced by the governance structures and processes guiding our academic management journals, peer review, and business school practices. We propose governance changes in academic publishing to encourage innovative research that may also generate knowledge-by-exemplification with strong ties to management practice
The much-discussed ‘relevance gap’ (Starkey and Madan, 2001) between research and practice in manage...
Despite significant successes and numerous exemplars of academic-practitioner collaboration, in rece...
We address the question of the visibility of management research for practitioners by measuring scie...
The rigor versus relevance debate of management research is ongoing. We contribute to this discussio...
Purpose The “relevance literature” often moans that the publications of top-ranked academic journals...
Since the 1930’s academics within the field of management have been discussing the relationship betw...
In many conferences and meetings in management subjects today, some academic scholars blame themselv...
Purpose: This paper aims to verify how interesting and useful practitioners find academic management...
In contrast to existing studies on the issue of the rigor—relevance gap, we do not discuss in this a...
Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to verify how interesting and useful practitioners find academ...
AbstractAcademic research in the domain of management scholarship, though steeped in scientific and ...
This paper discusses a number of avenues management scholars could follow to reduce the existing gap...
This paper addresses the debate on rigour and relevance in management research to identify barriers ...
Academic management research has a serious external relevance problem. In this article it is contend...
The much-discussed ‘relevance gap’ (Starkey and Madan, 2001) between research and practice in manage...
Despite significant successes and numerous exemplars of academic-practitioner collaboration, in rece...
We address the question of the visibility of management research for practitioners by measuring scie...
The rigor versus relevance debate of management research is ongoing. We contribute to this discussio...
Purpose The “relevance literature” often moans that the publications of top-ranked academic journals...
Since the 1930’s academics within the field of management have been discussing the relationship betw...
In many conferences and meetings in management subjects today, some academic scholars blame themselv...
Purpose: This paper aims to verify how interesting and useful practitioners find academic management...
In contrast to existing studies on the issue of the rigor—relevance gap, we do not discuss in this a...
Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to verify how interesting and useful practitioners find academ...
AbstractAcademic research in the domain of management scholarship, though steeped in scientific and ...
This paper discusses a number of avenues management scholars could follow to reduce the existing gap...
This paper addresses the debate on rigour and relevance in management research to identify barriers ...
Academic management research has a serious external relevance problem. In this article it is contend...
The much-discussed ‘relevance gap’ (Starkey and Madan, 2001) between research and practice in manage...
Despite significant successes and numerous exemplars of academic-practitioner collaboration, in rece...
We address the question of the visibility of management research for practitioners by measuring scie...