In the first era of financial globalization (1880-1914), global capital market integration led to substantial net capital movements from rich to poor economies. The historical experience stands in contrast to the contemporary globalization where gross capital mobility is equally high, but did not incite a substantial transfer of savings from rich to poor economies. Using data for the historical and modern periods we extend Lucas’ (1990) original model and show that differences in institutional quality between rich and poor countries can account for the sharply divergent patterns of international capital movements
The global integration of financial and capital markets has never been as advanced as it was at the ...
This paper is concerned with whether the persistence of the Lucas paradox (that unlike what the clas...
New data documenting European bond issues in major financial centres from 1919 to 1932 show that con...
We examine the empirical role of different explanations for the lack of flows of capital from rich t...
This paper investigates international capital flows to developing countries for the period 1970-2006...
We examine the empirical role of different explanations for the lack of flows of capital from rich t...
This thesis investigates the determinants of international capital flows and strives to present new ...
From Hume’s discussion of the specie-flow mechanism under the gold standard to the Keynes-Ohlin deba...
The Lucas Paradox observes that capital flows predominantly to relatively rich countries, contradict...
Standard economic theory suggests that capital should flow from rich countries to poor countries. Ho...
Alexander Monge-Naranjo is an economist and research officer at Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis an...
We examine the empirical role of information flows and institutional quality in explaining the capit...
Lucas (1990) argued that it was a paradox that more capital does not flow from rich countries to poo...
This dissertation investigates why capital does not flow from rich to poor countries. The neoclassic...
Standard economic theory suggests that capital should flow from rich countries to poor countries. Ho...
The global integration of financial and capital markets has never been as advanced as it was at the ...
This paper is concerned with whether the persistence of the Lucas paradox (that unlike what the clas...
New data documenting European bond issues in major financial centres from 1919 to 1932 show that con...
We examine the empirical role of different explanations for the lack of flows of capital from rich t...
This paper investigates international capital flows to developing countries for the period 1970-2006...
We examine the empirical role of different explanations for the lack of flows of capital from rich t...
This thesis investigates the determinants of international capital flows and strives to present new ...
From Hume’s discussion of the specie-flow mechanism under the gold standard to the Keynes-Ohlin deba...
The Lucas Paradox observes that capital flows predominantly to relatively rich countries, contradict...
Standard economic theory suggests that capital should flow from rich countries to poor countries. Ho...
Alexander Monge-Naranjo is an economist and research officer at Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis an...
We examine the empirical role of information flows and institutional quality in explaining the capit...
Lucas (1990) argued that it was a paradox that more capital does not flow from rich countries to poo...
This dissertation investigates why capital does not flow from rich to poor countries. The neoclassic...
Standard economic theory suggests that capital should flow from rich countries to poor countries. Ho...
The global integration of financial and capital markets has never been as advanced as it was at the ...
This paper is concerned with whether the persistence of the Lucas paradox (that unlike what the clas...
New data documenting European bond issues in major financial centres from 1919 to 1932 show that con...