Background: Evidence on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) is commonly derived from observational studies. However, these studies are prone to confounding by indication and healthy vaccinee bias. We aimed to systematically investigate these two forms of confounding/bias. Methods: Systematic review of observational studies reporting influenza VE and indicators for bias and confounding. We assessed risk of confounding by indication and healthy vaccinee bias for each study and calculated ratios of odds ratios (crude/adjusted) to quantify the effect of confounder adjustment. VE-estimates during and outside influenza seasons were compared to assess residual confounding by healthy vaccinee effects. Results: We identified 23 studies r...
BACKGROUND: The validity of non-randomized studies using healthcare databases is often challenged be...
Objective To compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional meta-an...
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional m...
Observational seasonal influenza relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) studies employ a variety of st...
In observational studies on causal associations, comparison groups (e.g. groups of treated and untre...
AbstractObjectivesUnobserved confounding has been suggested to explain the effect of influenza vacci...
Observational seasonal influenza relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) studies employ a variety of st...
OBJECTIVES: Unobserved confounding has been suggested to explain the effect of influenza vaccination...
Preinfluenza periods have been used to test for uncontrolled confounding in studies of influenza vac...
Nonexperimental studies of preventive interventions are often biased because of the healthy-user eff...
AbstractObjectivesEstimates of treatment effectiveness in epidemiologic studies using large observat...
BackgroundCohort studies on vaccine effectiveness are prone to confounding bias if the distribution ...
BACKGROUND: Observational studies of influenza vaccination are criticized as flawed due to unmeasure...
PURPOSE: In observational studies on influenza vaccine effectiveness, confounding variables such as ...
BACKGROUND: The validity of non-randomized studies using healthcare databases is often challenged be...
Objective To compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional meta-an...
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional m...
Observational seasonal influenza relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) studies employ a variety of st...
In observational studies on causal associations, comparison groups (e.g. groups of treated and untre...
AbstractObjectivesUnobserved confounding has been suggested to explain the effect of influenza vacci...
Observational seasonal influenza relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) studies employ a variety of st...
OBJECTIVES: Unobserved confounding has been suggested to explain the effect of influenza vaccination...
Preinfluenza periods have been used to test for uncontrolled confounding in studies of influenza vac...
Nonexperimental studies of preventive interventions are often biased because of the healthy-user eff...
AbstractObjectivesEstimates of treatment effectiveness in epidemiologic studies using large observat...
BackgroundCohort studies on vaccine effectiveness are prone to confounding bias if the distribution ...
BACKGROUND: Observational studies of influenza vaccination are criticized as flawed due to unmeasure...
PURPOSE: In observational studies on influenza vaccine effectiveness, confounding variables such as ...
BACKGROUND: The validity of non-randomized studies using healthcare databases is often challenged be...
Objective To compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional meta-an...
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the performance of the bias-adjusted meta-analysis to the conventional m...