Effect of vortical structures on velocity and turbulent fields in the near region of an impinging turbulent jet

This experimental study pertains to the formation of a secondary peak in heat transfer distribution for an axisymmetric turbulent impinging submerged jet. The analysis of instantaneous fields is undertaken at various Reynolds numbers based upon the bulk velocity and nozzle diameter (Re = 1300-10 000) and surface spacings (L/D = 0.25-6). Our analysis shows that flow separation and reattachment correspond to decrease/increase in local pressure and are caused by primary vortices; these are further linked to the location of maxima in streamwise and cross-stream velocities. It is further observed that the locations of maxima and minima in velocities are linked to fluctuations in rms velocities and thickening/thinning of the boundary layer. The vortices transported along the surface either coalesce among themselves or combine with other eddies to form a primary vortex. The primary vortex while getting convected downstream makes multiple interactions with the inner shear layer and causes waviness in instantaneous flow fields. In their later stage, the primary vortex moves away from the wall and accelerates, while the flow decelerates in the inner shear layer. The accelerated fluid in the outer shear layer pulls the downstream fluid from the inner shear layer and leads to the formation of a secondary vortex. After a certain distance downstream, the secondary vortex rolling between the primary vortex and the wall eventually breaks down, while the flow reattaches to the wall. The behavior of time average and instantaneous velocity fields suggests that unsteadiness in the heat transfer is linked to the location of maximum streamwise velocity, location of flow attachment, location of rms velocity, and thickness of the boundary layer. The instantaneous velocity fields show that for a given surface spacing, the chances for the appearance of the secondary vortex reduce with an increase in Reynolds number because of the reduction in space available for the secondary vortex to develop. It is further deduced that the strength of the secondary vortex is primarily dependent upon the strength of the primary vortex. However, the velocity field estimated using the linear stochastic estimation technique shows a tendency for the formation of the secondary vortex at higher Reynolds number, suggesting that most measurements do not resolve them well. Our analysis explains the reason for the appearance of the secondary peak in heat transfer distribution and helps resolve the contradictions in the literature regarding this phenomenon. Published by AIP Publishing