In this paper, I explain the arguments my critics target and I respond to their criticisms. Some of my replies further expand upon the ideas covered in my book—'A Conceptual Investigation of Justice'—and some cover matters that weren’t discussed there. This paper thus substantially contributes to the arguments made in my book
This article attempts to challenge those contemporary philosophical approaches to justice (and this ...
In this essay, I sketch a critical analysis of doctrines and practices commonly identified as instan...
This essay is a response to the excellent contributions to the double special issue of Law and Philo...
In this paper, I explain the arguments my critics target and I respond to their criticisms. Some of ...
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some ...
I reply to the critics of my book In A Better World? Public Reason and Biotechnologies. The discussi...
First paragraph: I am very grateful to my four commentators, Vincent Chiao, Shachar Eldar, Miri Gur-...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2014v13n1p18The paper is a commentary on Christoph Horn’s paper ...
It is a real pleasure to reply to so many thoughtful and probing responses to my book. In what follo...
Many theorists of justice aim to guide action. They attempt to describe what a society with just ins...
We thank our Mitch Berman, Doug Husak, Leo Katz, Jae Lee, and Alvaro Sandroni for their engagement w...
Abstract Kelsen wrote a book, much less known than his Reine Rechtslehre (Pure Theory of Law), calle...
Most of the time people look to the law for justice. The demand for justice is made in the form of a...
What does it mean to assert that judges should decide cases according to justice and not according t...
My topic in this essay is a major fault line within normative theory. More precisely, it is a major ...
This article attempts to challenge those contemporary philosophical approaches to justice (and this ...
In this essay, I sketch a critical analysis of doctrines and practices commonly identified as instan...
This essay is a response to the excellent contributions to the double special issue of Law and Philo...
In this paper, I explain the arguments my critics target and I respond to their criticisms. Some of ...
In this paper, I introduce the articles contained in this special issue, and I briefly explain some ...
I reply to the critics of my book In A Better World? Public Reason and Biotechnologies. The discussi...
First paragraph: I am very grateful to my four commentators, Vincent Chiao, Shachar Eldar, Miri Gur-...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2014v13n1p18The paper is a commentary on Christoph Horn’s paper ...
It is a real pleasure to reply to so many thoughtful and probing responses to my book. In what follo...
Many theorists of justice aim to guide action. They attempt to describe what a society with just ins...
We thank our Mitch Berman, Doug Husak, Leo Katz, Jae Lee, and Alvaro Sandroni for their engagement w...
Abstract Kelsen wrote a book, much less known than his Reine Rechtslehre (Pure Theory of Law), calle...
Most of the time people look to the law for justice. The demand for justice is made in the form of a...
What does it mean to assert that judges should decide cases according to justice and not according t...
My topic in this essay is a major fault line within normative theory. More precisely, it is a major ...
This article attempts to challenge those contemporary philosophical approaches to justice (and this ...
In this essay, I sketch a critical analysis of doctrines and practices commonly identified as instan...
This essay is a response to the excellent contributions to the double special issue of Law and Philo...