This paper develops an account of metaphysical explanation according to which metaphysical explanations are answers to what-makes-it-the-case-that-questions. On this view, metaphysical explanations are not to be considered entirely objective, but are subject to epistemic constraints imposed by the context in which a relevant question is asked. The resultant account of metaphysical explanation is developed independently of any particular views about grounding. Towards the end of the paper an application of the view is proposed which takes metaphysical explanations conceived in this way to characterise reality’s structure. According to this proposal, reality’s structure is partly constituted by a projection of our explanatory practices onto r...