The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes of the peer review process remains uncertain due to substantial variation among studies. We test whether gender predicts the outcomes of editorial and peer review for >23,000 research manuscripts submitted to six journals in ecology and evolution from 2010 to 2015. Papers with female and male first authors were equally likely to be sent for peer review. However, papers with female first authors obtained, on average, slightly worse peer review scores and ...
The fairness of decisions made at various stages of the publication process is an important topic in...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...
This study investigated the possibility of gender differences in outcomes throughout the peer review...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This study investigated whether the gender of manuscript authors affected reviewers\u27 editorial de...
The fairness of decisions made at various stages of the publication process is an important topic in...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...
This study investigated the possibility of gender differences in outcomes throughout the peer review...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biase...
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in control...
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that c...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientifi...
Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of ...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
The loss of talented women from senior academic positions has partly resulted from a lower number of...
This article examines gender bias in peer review with complete data on 145 journals in various field...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This study investigated whether the gender of manuscript authors affected reviewers\u27 editorial de...
The fairness of decisions made at various stages of the publication process is an important topic in...
Background: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality researc...
This study investigated the possibility of gender differences in outcomes throughout the peer review...