[Introduction] This note is intended to explore some of the issues raised l)y Avery Katz's provocative paper. The question posed in his paper is whether the English rule or the American rule generates more legal fees. Katz uses game theoretic motivation for the elasticity measures that are central to his analysis. However, the analysis proceeds in terms of elasticity models so the implications of the underlying game theory remain rather obscure. The approach taken here is to analyze a game-theoretic model directly to discover where the basic principles of the theory lead. The basic approach is similar to other papers and the contribution here is to work out the details of an easy-to-follow example
Recent years have seen a debate over litigation reform grow increasingly agitated. Attorneys, judges...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser (“loser pays”) as elsewhere in th...
Should the party who loses in litigation be forced to pay the legal fees of the winner? This paper s...
The expanding volume of lawsuits and the ballooning of legal expenditures in recent years has attra...
In the past couple of decades, scholars have predominantly employed rent-seeking models to analyze l...
This article theoretically compares the British and American fee-shifting rules in their influences ...
When plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the American rule (...
Several critiques have been leveled at the American Rule—that is, the rule that each party to a laws...
A simple auction-theoretic framework is used to examine symmetric litigation environments where the ...
International audienceIn this paper, we conduct an experiment in order to explore how the legal fee ...
The English rule for fee allocation prescribes that the loser of a lawsuit pay the winner’s litigati...
We show that, when plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the A...
Litigation costs could be conceived as a bribe to parties to reach a contractual agreement settling ...
We study the effect of fee shifting rules on litigation. First, we build a model to study the theore...
In the past couple of decades, scholars have predominantly employed rent-seeking models to analyze l...
Recent years have seen a debate over litigation reform grow increasingly agitated. Attorneys, judges...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser (“loser pays”) as elsewhere in th...
Should the party who loses in litigation be forced to pay the legal fees of the winner? This paper s...
The expanding volume of lawsuits and the ballooning of legal expenditures in recent years has attra...
In the past couple of decades, scholars have predominantly employed rent-seeking models to analyze l...
This article theoretically compares the British and American fee-shifting rules in their influences ...
When plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the American rule (...
Several critiques have been leveled at the American Rule—that is, the rule that each party to a laws...
A simple auction-theoretic framework is used to examine symmetric litigation environments where the ...
International audienceIn this paper, we conduct an experiment in order to explore how the legal fee ...
The English rule for fee allocation prescribes that the loser of a lawsuit pay the winner’s litigati...
We show that, when plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the A...
Litigation costs could be conceived as a bribe to parties to reach a contractual agreement settling ...
We study the effect of fee shifting rules on litigation. First, we build a model to study the theore...
In the past couple of decades, scholars have predominantly employed rent-seeking models to analyze l...
Recent years have seen a debate over litigation reform grow increasingly agitated. Attorneys, judges...
Court costs in American civil procedure are allocated to the loser (“loser pays”) as elsewhere in th...
Should the party who loses in litigation be forced to pay the legal fees of the winner? This paper s...