Political Discourse of Parties MOST and Živi zid in Parliament 2017

Cilj ovog diplomskog rada je da se analizom diskursa utvrde razlike u govorima političkih stranaka Živi zid i Most u Hrvatskom saboru u 2017. godini. Prije analize razradit će se teoretski dio i kontekst koji će obuhvaćati diskursne i društvene prakse, kao i osnovni podaci o spomenutim strankama i kratke biografije o istaknutijim zastupnicima čiji će se govori analizirati. Stranke Živi zid i Most imaju drugačiji pristup političkom diskursu nego dosadašnji političari. Upravo zbog toga analizirat će se i njihovo ponašanje te način na koji pristupaju javnom govoru u Saboru koji ima jasno propisana pravila ponašanja. Uspoređivat će se govori zastupnika, a vidjet ćemo zastupljenost ideologije, korištenje stilskih sredstava te samo ponašanje. Analiza će pokazati na koje načine stranke koriste diskurs i po čemu se on razlikuje od uobičajenog te odnos prema ostalim strankama.The purpose of this graduate thesis is to find differences in the speech with discourse analysis of the political parties Živi zid and Most at the Croatian Parliament in 2017. Before the analysis, the theoretical part and context will be elaborated, which will include discourse and social practice, as well as basic information on the mentioned parties and a short biography on the more prominent representatives whose speeches will be analyzed. The Parties Živi zid and Most have a different approach to political discourse than the former politicians. Because of that we will be analyzing and their behavior and the way they approach public speech in the Parliament, which has clearly prescribed rules of conduct. We will be comparing representatives speech and we will see representation of ideology, the use of figures of speech and behavior. The analysis will show how the parties use discourse and how is it differs from the usual and the relationship with the other parties