Concept and types of administrative disputes : diploma paper

Predmet ovog diplomskog rada je pojam i vrsta upravnog spora. Po užem shvaćanju spora, riječ je o sporu koji teče između više ili manje suprotstavljenih stranaka koje se spore oko određenog zahtjeva. Spor u širem smislu je onaj koji postoji čim dođe do suprotstavljanja nekom zahtjevu, pri čemu nije potrebno da onaj tko se suprotstavlja zahtjevu ima procesni položaj stranke. Uloga upravnog spora je zaštita objektivne zakonitosti i subjektivnih prava građana. Kako se nalazi u središtu interesa pravne teorije, prema određenim kriterijima formirane su različite vrste spora. U hrvatskoj teroiji sporovi se dijele na: spor o zakonitosti i spor pune jurisdikcije, objektivni i subjektivni spor, prvotni i naknadni spor. Najznačajnija podjela je na spor o zakonitsti i spor pune jurisdikcije. Kod spora o zakonitosti sud utvrđuje je li akt koji je predmet spora zakonit u formalnom i materijalnom smislu, dok kod spora pune jurisdikcije sud, ako utvrdi da je akt nezakonit, sam, meritorno rjesava predmet spora.The subject of this diploma thesis is the concept and types of administrative disputes. A narrow understending of the conflict is a dispute being between more or less conflicting parties to argue over a specific requirement. Dispute in the broader sense is the one that exists as soon as the opposition to a request has been raised without being necessary for the one who opposes the request has the procedural status of the party. The role of administrative dispute is protection objective laws and subjective rights of citizens. Being in the centre of interest of legal theory, according to certain, different types of disputes have been formed.In the Croatian theory, disputes are divided into: dispute about legality and full jurisdiction, real and perceived dispute, the original and subsequent dispute. The most imortant division is a dispute about legality and the full jurisdiction. In a dispute over legality, court determines whether an act in dispute is legitimate in the formal and material sense, while in the dispute of full jurisdiction, the court, if finds that the act is unlawful, competently resolves such a dispute